In re: Indirect Plaintiff Class, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
Defendant / Appellee: EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, NEC DISPLAY SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC., TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC., KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., TOSHIBA CORPORATION, EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LTD., TATUNG COMPANY, SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD., HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC., CMO JAPAN CO., LTD., CHIMEI INNOLUX CORP., SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONICS COMPONENTS, INC., NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA INC., MITSUI & CO. (TAIWAN), LIMITED, HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD., SANYO CONSUMER ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., LG DISPLAY AMERICA, INC., NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA, NEC LCD TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES LTD., MITSUI & CO. (U.S.A.), INC., PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, SHARP CORPORATION, NEC ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA MATSUSHITA DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC., NEC ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION, LG DISPLAY CO., LTD., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., CHI MEI CORPORATION, NEC CORPORATION, HITACHI LTD., AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and TOSHIBA MOBILE DISPLAY CO., LTD.
Not Classified By Court: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Appellant: JOSEPH DARRELL PALMER, ALISON PAUL and LEVETA CHESSER
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
Case Number: 13-15365
Filed: February 27, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 23, 2014 Filing 45 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: GS) The appellants motion under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) for voluntary dismissal with prejudice is granted. A copy of this order shall act as and for the mandate of this court. [9107074] (WL) [Entered: 05/23/2014 11:35 AM]
May 22, 2014 Filing 44 Filed (ECF) Appellants Leveta Chesser, Joseph Darrell Palmer and Alison Paul Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 05/22/2014. [9105846] (Palmer, Joseph) [Entered: 05/22/2014 12:02 PM]
April 11, 2014 Filing 43 Terminated Kimberly Linnell Taylor for Epson Imaging Devices Corporation in 13-15365 (Csl no longer w/firm) [9054609] (ASW) [Entered: 04/11/2014 10:48 AM]
January 31, 2014 Filing 42 Terminated Appellees Koninklijke Philips Electronics, NV and Philips Electronics North America Corporation in 13-15365 [8961733] (WL) [Entered: 01/31/2014 03:31 PM]
January 31, 2014 Filing 41 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: TAH): The motion of defendants Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. and Philips Electronics North America Corporation to amend the caption is granted. The noted defendants shall be removed from the caption of this case and shall be removed from the service list.[8961726] (WL) [Entered: 01/31/2014 03:29 PM]
January 30, 2014 Filing 40 Filed (ECF) Appellees Koninklijke Philips Electronics, NV and Philips Electronics North America Corporation Motion for miscellaneous relief [Motion to Amend the Caption]. Date of service: 01/30/2014. [8959445] (Cullen, Brendan) [Entered: 01/30/2014 12:47 PM]
January 30, 2014 Filing 39 Attorney Matthew Scott Fitzwater substituted by Attorney Brendan Peter Cullen. [8958982] (RL) [Entered: 01/30/2014 10:13 AM]
January 30, 2014 Filing 38 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Brendan P. Cullen for Appellees Koninklijke Philips Electronics, NV and Philips Electronics North America Corporation. Date of service: 01/30/2014. [8958966] (Cullen, Brendan) [Entered: 01/30/2014 10:09 AM]
December 20, 2013 Filing 37 Received 7 paper copies of Reply brief [ # 33 ] filed by appellants. [8911256] (SD) [Entered: 12/20/2013 01:42 PM]
December 16, 2013 Filing 36 Terminated James U. Kreissman for Nexgen Mediatech USA Inc., Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., Chi Mei Corporation and CMO Japan Co., Ltd. in 13-15365, Courtney Lynn Landis for Hitachi Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc. and Hitachi Displays, Ltd. in 13-15365, Daniel Suleiman for Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. in 13-15365 for failure to register for Appellate ECF. [8903825] (LA) [Entered: 12/16/2013 05:20 PM]
December 16, 2013 Filing 35 Filed clerk order: The reply brief [ # 33 ] submitted by appellants is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: gray. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. [8903818] (LA) [Entered: 12/16/2013 05:14 PM]
December 16, 2013 Filing 34 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: TAH): The appellants motion for leave to file the reply brief one day late is granted. The Clerk shall file the reply brief. [8902556] (RT) [Entered: 12/16/2013 11:31 AM]
December 12, 2013 Filing 33 Submitted (ECF) Reply brief for review and filed Motion to file a late brief. Submitted by Appellants Leveta Chesser, Joseph Darrell Palmer and Alison Paul. Date of service: 12/12/2013. [8899561] (Palmer, Joseph) [Entered: 12/12/2013 02:42 PM]
December 3, 2013 Filing 32 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: cag): Granting Motion (ECF Filing) motion to extend time to file brief filed by Appellants Alison Paul, Leveta Chesser and Joseph Darrell Palmer. The optional reply brief is due December 11, 2013. [8885784] (CG) [Entered: 12/03/2013 10:56 AM]
November 27, 2013 Filing 31 Filed (ECF) Appellants Leveta Chesser, Joseph Darrell Palmer and Alison Paul Motion to extend time to file Reply brief until 12/11/2013. Date of service: 11/27/2013. [8882278] (Palmer, Joseph) [Entered: 11/27/2013 06:48 PM]
October 24, 2013 Filing 30 Streamlined request [29] by Appellants Leveta Chesser, Joseph Darrell Palmer and Alison Paul to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: the optional reply brief is due November 27, 2013. [8835192] (CB) [Entered: 10/24/2013 12:36 PM]
October 23, 2013 Filing 29 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Reply Brief by Appellants Leveta Chesser, Joseph Darrell Palmer and Alison Paul. New requested due date is 11/27/2013. [8834287] (Palmer, Joseph) [Entered: 10/23/2013 09:50 PM]
October 17, 2013 Filing 28 Received 7 paper copies of Answering brief [ # 26 ] filed by Indirect Plaintiff Class. [8826214] (DB) [Entered: 10/17/2013 04:47 PM]
October 16, 2013 Filing 27 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 26 ] submitted by Indirect Plaintiff Class is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. [8823747] (CT) [Entered: 10/16/2013 03:10 PM]
October 15, 2013 Filing 26 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class. Date of service: 10/15/2013. [8821576] (Clayton, Patrick) [Entered: 10/15/2013 02:33 PM]
September 18, 2013 Filing 25 Terminated Appellees NEC Corporation, NEC Corporation of America, NEC Display Solutions of America, Inc., NEC Electronics America, Inc., NEC Electronics Corporation and NEC LCD Technologies, Ltd. [8787292] [13-15365, 13-15915, 13-15916, 13-15917, 13-15920, 13-15930, 13-15934, 13-16216, 13-16793] (HH) [Entered: 09/18/2013 10:01 AM]
September 18, 2013 Filing 24 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CB): The motions of Appellants Dunmore and Dale in Nos. 13-15915 and 13- 16216 for a limited remand is denied. The denial is without prejudice to a renewed motion that demonstrates the district court has indicated that it would grant or entertain the motion. Fed. R. App. P. 12.1. Briefing in Nos. 13-15915 and 13- 16216 is amended as follows: the opening briefs are due October 18, 2013; the answering briefs are due November 18, 2013 and the optional reply briefs are due within 14 days after service of the answering briefs. The briefing schedules in the remainder of the above captioned cases remain in place. The motion in No. 13-15930 to be exempted from the requirement to include the district court docket sheet in the excerpts is granted. NEC Corporation, NEC LCD Technologies, Ltd., NEC Electronics America, Inc., NEC Display Solutions of America Renesas Electronic American, NEC Corporation of America, and NEC Electronics Corporations (The NEC Entities), motion to amend the caption is granted. The NEC Entities shall be removed from the caption of this case and shall be removed from the service list. [8787218] [13-15365, 13-15915, 13-15916, 13-15917, 13-15920, 13-15930, 13-15934, 13-16216, 13-16793] (SAM) [Entered: 09/18/2013 09:44 AM]
September 13, 2013 Filing 23 Terminated participation of Court Reporter James Jonathan Yeomans in this case. [8782353] (ASW) [Entered: 09/13/2013 04:18 PM]
September 12, 2013 Filing 22 Streamlined request [21] by Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class answering brief due 10/15/2013. The optional reply brief is due 14 days from the date of service of the last-served answering brief. [8779768] (LBS) [Entered: 09/12/2013 12:00 PM]
September 11, 2013 Filing 21 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Answering Brief by Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class. New requested due date is 10/15/2013 at 05:00 pm. [8778928] (Clayton, Patrick) [Entered: 09/11/2013 06:41 PM]
September 3, 2013 Filing 20 Filed Appellants' paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 13 ] in 2 volume(s). [8770442] (LA) [Entered: 09/05/2013 02:27 PM]
September 3, 2013 Filing 19 Received 7 paper copies of Opening brief [ # 13 ] filed by Appellants. [8767347] (SD) [Entered: 09/04/2013 09:33 AM]
August 28, 2013 Filing 18 Filed (ECF) Appellees NEC Corporation, NEC Corporation of America, NEC Display Solutions of America, Inc., NEC Electronics America, Inc., NEC Electronics Corporation, NEC LCD Technologies, Ltd. and Renesas Electronics America Motion for miscellaneous relief [NEC Entitites' Motion to Amend Caption]. Date of service: 08/28/2013. [8760370] (Sutro, Stephen) [Entered: 08/28/2013 02:25 PM]
August 27, 2013 Filing 17 Terminated Sean David Unger for Epson Electronics America, Inc. [8758291] (RL) [Entered: 08/27/2013 01:55 PM]
August 26, 2013 Filing 16 Received Appellee Epson Electronics America, Inc. notice regarding to remove attorney Sean Unger from the docket. [8758284] (RL) [Entered: 08/27/2013 01:54 PM]
August 13, 2013 Filing 15 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 13 ] submitted by appellants is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: blue. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. The Court has reviewed the excerpts of record [ # 13 ] submitted by appellants. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 4 copies of the excerpts in paper format, with a white cover. The paper copies must be in the format described in 9th Circuit Rule 30-1.6. [8741980] (LA) [Entered: 08/13/2013 04:50 PM]
August 13, 2013 Filing 14 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): Appellants Alison Paul, Leveta Chesser, and Darrell Palmers opposed motion to reinstate is granted. The Clerk shall file the opening brief. The answering brief is due within 30 days after the date of this order. The optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief. (Pro Mo) [8741935] (MS) [Entered: 08/13/2013 04:30 PM]
July 22, 2013 Filing 13 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief and excerpts of record for review. Submitted by Appellants Leveta Chesser, Joseph Darrell Palmer and Alison Paul. Date of service: 07/22/2013. [8713008]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected brief and excerpts. Resent NDA. 07/26/2013 by RY] (Palmer, Joseph) [Entered: 07/22/2013 02:01 PM]
July 22, 2013 Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class response opposing motion (,motion to reinstate case after FRAP 42-1 dismissal). Date of service: 07/22/2013. [8712134] (Clayton, Patrick) [Entered: 07/22/2013 09:34 AM]
July 16, 2013 Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellants Leveta Chesser, Joseph Darrell Palmer and Alison Paul Motion to reinstate case after FRAP 42-1 dismissal. Date of service: 07/16/2013. [8706613] (Palmer, Joseph) [Entered: 07/16/2013 06:02 PM]
July 5, 2013 Filing 10 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: MS)Court records reflect that appellants have failed to file an opening brief. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for failure to prosecute. Ninth Cir. Rule 42-1 and Ninth Cir. Rule 31-2.3. A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court.. [8693059] (SAM) [Entered: 07/05/2013 04:58 PM]
June 12, 2013 Filing 9 Terminated Chet Alan Kronenberg for LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc. [8664456] (RL) [Entered: 06/12/2013 10:44 AM]
June 11, 2013 Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellees LG Display America, Inc. and LG Display Co., Ltd. Correspondence: Notice of attorney withdrawal. Date of service: 06/11/2013 [8663927]--[COURT UPDATE: Edited docket text to reflect content of filing. Resent NDA. 06/12/2013 by RY] (Kronenberg, Chet) [Entered: 06/11/2013 04:50 PM]
June 3, 2013 Filing 7 Streamlined request [6] by Appellants Leveta Chesser, Joseph Darrell Palmer and Alison Paul to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants Leveta Chesser, Joseph Darrell Palmer and Alison Paul opening brief due 07/03/2013. Appellees AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Chi Mei Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., Chimei Innolux Corp., Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd., Epson Electronics America, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, Hannstar Display Corporation, Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., Hitachi Ltd., Indirect Plaintiff Class, Koninklijke Philips Electronics, NV, LG Display America, Inc., LG Display Co., Ltd., Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Limited, Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc., NEC Corporation, NEC Corporation of America, NEC Display Solutions of America, Inc., NEC Electronics America, Inc., NEC Electronics Corporation, NEC LCD Technologies, Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech USA Inc., Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Renesas Electronics America, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd., Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Tatung Company, Tatung Company of America, Inc., Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba Matsushita Display Technology Co., LTD. and Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd. answering brief due 08/02/2013. The optional reply brief is due 14 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [8653309] (CB) [Entered: 06/03/2013 06:59 PM]
June 3, 2013 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants Leveta Chesser, Joseph Darrell Palmer and Alison Paul. New requested due date is 07/03/2013. [8653155] (Palmer, Joseph) [Entered: 06/03/2013 04:32 PM]
April 19, 2013 Filing 5 Case rejected from Circuit Mediation Program. [8596097] (LW) [Entered: 04/19/2013 10:11 AM]
April 1, 2013 Filing 4 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 455.00. Date paid: 04/01/2013. [8572219] (RT) [Entered: 04/01/2013 01:23 PM]
March 8, 2013 Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: DEV): Order to show cause docket fee due. [8544067] (DEV) [Entered: 03/08/2013 04:58 PM]
March 6, 2013 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Leveta Chesser, Joseph Darrell Palmer and Alison Paul Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/06/2013. [8540103] (Palmer, Joseph) [Entered: 03/06/2013 04:37 PM]
February 27, 2013 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Fee due from Appellants Leveta Chesser, Joseph Darrell Palmer and Alison Paul on 02/27/2013. Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/06/2013. Transcript ordered by 03/22/2013. Transcript due 04/22/2013. Appellants Leveta Chesser, Joseph Darrell Palmer and Alison Paul opening brief due 06/03/2013. Appellees AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Chi Mei Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., Chimei Innolux Corp., Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd., Epson Electronics America, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, Hannstar Display Corporation, Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., Hitachi Ltd., Indirect Plaintiff Class, Koninklijke Philips Electronics, NV, LG Display America, Inc., LG Display Co., Ltd., Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Limited, Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc., NEC Corporation, NEC Corporation of America, NEC Display Solutions of America, Inc., NEC Electronics America, Inc., NEC Electronics Corporation, NEC LCD Technologies, Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech USA Inc., Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Renesas Electronics America, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd., Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Tatung Company, Tatung Company of America, Inc., Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba Matsushita Display Technology Co., LTD. and Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd. answering brief due 07/03/2013. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [8528415] (GR) [Entered: 02/27/2013 09:18 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Indirect Plaintiff Class, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION
Represented By: Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By: Stephen P. Freccero
Represented By: Stephen E. Taylor Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NEC DISPLAY SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC.
Represented By: James McGinnis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC.
Represented By: Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By: William Farmer Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION
Represented By: Christopher M. Curran
Represented By: Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By: John H. Chung
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Represented By: Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By: Melvin R. Goldman Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LTD.
Represented By: Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By: Jeffrey Michael Davidson Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TATUNG COMPANY
Represented By: Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By: William Farmer Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.
Represented By: James McGinnis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC.
Represented By: Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By: Kent Michael Roger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CMO JAPAN CO., LTD.
Represented By: Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By: Harrison Frahn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHIMEI INNOLUX CORP.
Represented By: Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By: Harrison Frahn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
Represented By: Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By: Anne Kaldor Sauro
Represented By: Jacob R. Sorensen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONICS COMPONENTS, INC.
Represented By: Christopher M. Curran
Represented By: Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By: John H. Chung
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA INC.
Represented By: Harrison Frahn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MITSUI & CO. (TAIWAN), LIMITED
Represented By: Peter W. James Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD.
Represented By: Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By: Kent Michael Roger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SANYO CONSUMER ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Represented By: Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By: Sam Dawood Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LG DISPLAY AMERICA, INC.
Represented By: Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By: Holly Adele House Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NEC LCD TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES LTD.
Represented By: Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By: William Farmer Esquire
Represented By: Rachel Susan Brass
Represented By: Joel Steven Sanders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MITSUI & CO. (U.S.A.), INC.
Represented By: Ernest Eugene Vargo Esquire Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SHARP CORPORATION
Represented By: Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By: Anne Kaldor Sauro
Represented By: Jacob R. Sorensen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NEC ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TOSHIBA MATSUSHITA DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
Represented By: John H. Chung
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA
Represented By: Stephen Holbrook Sutro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC.
Represented By: Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By: Harrison Frahn
Represented By: Jake J. Ewart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NEC ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Represented By: Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION
Represented By: Jerry Chen Esquire
Represented By: Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By: Donald H. Mullins Esquire
Represented By: Ismail Ramsey
Represented By: Robert E. Freitas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LG DISPLAY CO., LTD.
Represented By: Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By: Hailyn Jennifer Chen
Represented By: Holly Adele House Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.
Represented By: Christopher M. Curran
Represented By: Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By: John H. Chung
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHI MEI CORPORATION
Represented By: Harrison Frahn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NEC CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HITACHI LTD.
Represented By: Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By: Kent Michael Roger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, INC.
Represented By: Jason H. Wilson
Represented By: Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By: Martha Ann Boersch Esquire
Represented By: Allison M. Dibley Esquire
Represented By: Kirk Christopher Jenkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Represented By: Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TOSHIBA MOBILE DISPLAY CO., LTD.
Represented By: Christopher M. Curran
Represented By: Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By: John H. Chung
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: JOSEPH DARRELL PALMER
Represented By: Joseph Darrell Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: ALISON PAUL
Represented By: Joseph Darrell Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: LEVETA CHESSER
Represented By: Joseph Darrell Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
Represented By: Qianwei Fu
Represented By: Judith Zahid
Represented By: Francis O. Scarpulla Esquire
Represented By: Patrick B. Clayton
Represented By: John Bogdanov
Represented By: Craig C. Corbitt Esquire
Represented By: Joseph M. Alioto
Represented By: Josef Cooper
Represented By: Theresa D. Moore Esquire
Represented By: Heather Thompson Rankie
Represented By: Tracy Rena Kirkham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?