USA v. 2.739 Acres of Land, et al
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 2.739 ACRES OF LAND, more or less situates in the City of Nogales, County of Santa Cruz, State of Arizona and HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL, INC. |
| 13-15953 |
| May 10, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Land Condemnation |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. 2.739 Acres of Land, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee,: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Charles Alexander Davis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant,: 2.739 ACRES OF LAND, more or less situates in the City of Nogales, County of Santa Cruz, State of Arizona | |
| Represented By: | Thomas M. Parsons |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant,: HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Thomas M. Parsons |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
