Weltha Jones-Rankins v. Cardinal Health Incorporated, et al
| VALERIE PITTEROFF, JOHNNI BECKEL, BRIAN K. MERRILL, RYAN MCGRAW, CARDINAL HEALTH INCORPORATED, ELIZABETH BROWN, STEVEN B. MERKIN, ROBERT S. RANDKLER and LISA MARLING-GEORGE |
| WELTHA J. JONES-RANKINS |
| 13-16486 |
| July 23, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Civil Rights Jobs |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 The petition for writ of certiorari was denied on 10/14/2014. Supreme Court number 14-5671. [9275673] (HH) [Entered: 10/14/2014 12:45 PM] |
| Filing 17 The petition for writ of certiorari was denied on 10/14/2014. Supreme Court number 14-5671. [9275654] (RR) [Entered: 10/14/2014 12:37 PM] |
| Filing 16 Received courtesy copy of petitioner letter dated 8/6/14 from the U.S. Supreme Court re: the petition for a writ of certiorari was filed on 8/1/14 and placed on the docket 8/6/14 as No. 14-5671. [9209203] (RR) [Entered: 08/18/2014 04:47 PM] |
| Filing 15 Received notice from the Supreme Court: petition for certiorari filed on 08/01/2014. Supreme Court Number 14-5671. [9196959] (RR) [Entered: 08/07/2014 11:16 AM] |
| Filing 14 MANDATE ISSUED. (EL, CMC and ADH) [9119817] (Turcios, Margoth) [Entered: 06/04/2014 01:18 PM] |
| Filing 13 Filed order (EDWARD LEAVY, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN and ANDREW D. HURWITZ) Appellants March 28, 2014 motion for an order vacating the dismissal of the appeal is construed as a motion to reinstate this appeal. So construed, the motion is granted. Appellants March 28, 2014 request for judicial notice is granted. The March 28, 2014 motion is also construed as a response to the courts October 23, 2013 order to show cause. A review of the record and appellants March 28, 2014 filings indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district courts judgment. AFFIRMED. [9091728] (SAM) [Entered: 05/12/2014 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 12 Filed Appellant Weltha J. Jones-Rankins motion to take judicial notice. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/27/2014. [9037177] (Turcios, Margoth) [Entered: 03/31/2014 11:00 AM] |
| Filing 11 Filed Appellant Weltha J. Jones-Rankins motion for an order vacating the dismissal of the appeal; memorandum of points and authorities; and declaration of Weltha J. Jones-Rankins. . Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/27/2014. [9037142] (Turcios, Margoth) [Entered: 03/31/2014 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 10 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 455.00. Date paid: 03/26/2014. [9033018] (RT) [Entered: 03/26/2014 05:21 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON) On October 23, 2013, this court ordered appellant, within 21 days, to pay the filing fees and show cause why the orders challenged in this appeal should not be summarily affirmed. The October 23, 2013 order warned appellant that failure to comply would result in the automatic dismissal of the appeal by the Clerk of the Court. To date, appellant has not complied with the courts order. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. Appellants motion to stay issuance of the mandate is denied. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(d)(2). This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court. [8930064] (SAM) [Entered: 01/08/2014 02:27 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant Weltha J. Jones-Rankins motion to stay the mandate pending filing of petition for writ of certiorari. Served on 11/12/2013. [8862726] (Turcios, Margoth) [Entered: 11/14/2013 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 7 Streamlined request by Appellant Weltha J. Jones-Rankins to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [8843038] (LKK) [Entered: 10/30/2013 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 6 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 13-16486: Due] ). [8833018] (SAM) [Entered: 10/23/2013 11:35 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON) The district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. We deny appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis because we also find the appeal is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). If appellant wishes to pursue this appeal despite the courts finding that it is frivolous then, within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall pay $455.00 to the district court as the docketing and filing fees for this appeal and file proof of payment with this court. Otherwise, the appeal will be dismissed by the Clerk for failure to prosecute, regardless of further filings. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. No motions for reconsideration, clarification, or modification of the denial of appellants in forma pauperis status shall be entertained. Because the court has found that this appeal is frivolous, the district court orders may be summarily affirmed even if appellant pays the fees. If appellant pays the fees and files proof of such payment in this court, appellant therefore shall simultaneously show cause why the orders challenged in this appeal should not be summarily affirmed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of appellants filing. If appellant pays the fees but fails to file a response to this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with this order, the court will not entertain any motion to reinstate the appeal that is not accompanied by proof of payment of the docketing and filing fees and a response to the order to show cause. Briefing is suspended pending further order of this court. [8833009] (SAM) [Entered: 10/23/2013 11:34 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Weltha J. Jones-Rankins motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Served on 08/15/2013. [8748382] (Turcios, Margoth) [Entered: 08/19/2013 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 07/25/2013 it is ordered that plaintiff's IFP status is revoked. [8720129] (Turcios, Margoth) [Entered: 07/26/2013 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [8715855] (CKP) [Entered: 07/24/2013 11:13 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Weltha J. Jones-Rankins opening brief due 10/28/2013. Appellees Johnni Beckel, Elizabeth Brown, Cardinal Health Incorporated, Lisa Marling-George, Ryan McGraw, Steven B. Merkin, Brian K. Merrill, Valerie Pitteroff and Robert S. Randkler answering brief due 11/26/2013. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [8714195] (SAM) [Entered: 07/23/2013 10:39 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
