Cuprite Mine Partners LLC v. John Anderson, et al
| CUPRITE MINE PARTNERS LLC, an Arizona limited liability company |
| JOHN H. ANDERSON, a married man, acting in his sole and separate capacity, TODD CHRISTIAN ANDERSON, a married man, acting in his sole a separate capacity, MARGARET JANE ANDERSON LILJEMQUIST, a married woman, acting in her sole and separate capacity, PETER HAAKON ANDERSON, a single man and STACEY ELIZABETH ANDER ORD, a married woman, acting in her sole and separate capacity |
| 13-16657 |
| August 19, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Real Property Actions |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Cuprite Mine Partners v. Anderson
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Cuprite Mine Partners LLC v. John Anderson, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee,: CUPRITE MINE PARTNERS LLC, an Arizona limited liability company | |
| Represented By: | John Carleton Lacy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant,: JOHN H. ANDERSON, a married man, acting in his sole and separate capacity | |
| Represented By: | John H. Anderson |
| Represented By: | Todd C. Anderson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant,: TODD CHRISTIAN ANDERSON, a married man, acting in his sole a separate capacity | |
| Represented By: | John H. Anderson |
| Represented By: | Todd C. Anderson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant,: MARGARET JANE ANDERSON LILJEMQUIST, a married woman, acting in her sole and separate capacity | |
| Represented By: | John H. Anderson |
| Represented By: | Todd C. Anderson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant,: PETER HAAKON ANDERSON, a single man | |
| Represented By: | John H. Anderson |
| Represented By: | Todd C. Anderson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant,: STACEY ELIZABETH ANDER ORD, a married woman, acting in her sole and separate capacity | |
| Represented By: | John H. Anderson |
| Represented By: | Todd C. Anderson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
