In re: Paul Beste, et al v. Alec Harrington, et al
| In the Matter of: PAUL DEN BESTE |
| PAUL DEN BESTE |
| ALEC HARRINGTON, ERIC D. TETRAULT, RUSSELL DALE STANALAND, EDITH MAZZAFERRI and MANSUETO ANTHONY LENCI |
| 13-17494 |
| December 6, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Mail returned on 05/08/2017 addressed to Mansueto Anthony Lenci, re: 4/18/17 order. Returned envelope reads; return to sender, unable to fwd, not deliverable as addressed. Resending to: casefile-no fwd address. [10425852] (Turcios, Margoth) [Entered: 05/08/2017 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 11 Mail returned on 04/18/2017 addressed to Mansueto Anthony Lenci, re: MD. Resending to: Unable to forward sent to case file. [10406684] (PH) [Entered: 04/21/2017 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 10 MANDATE ISSUED. (EL, WAF and JBO) [10400252] (Turcios, Margoth) [Entered: 04/18/2017 11:01 AM] |
| Filing 9 Filed Appellant Paul Den Beste notice that appeal is moot and respondents failed to cure default. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/03/2017. [10383221] (JFF) [Entered: 04/04/2017 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 8 FILED MEMORANDUM (EDWARD LEAVY, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and JOHN B. OWENS) AFFIRMED. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [10372154] (Buccinio, Gabriela) [Entered: 03/27/2017 10:45 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: TAH): Denying Motion (ECF Filing) Appellee Edith Mazzaferris motion for leave to file the answering brief late is construed as a motion for relief from default and is denied without prejudice to a renewed motion accompanied by a certificate of service showing that the appellant was served with a copy of the motion. Fed. R. App. P. 25(b). Any renewed motion must be filed within 14 days after the date of this order. [9215251] (IV) [Entered: 08/22/2014 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellee Edith Mazzaferri Motion to file a late brief. Date of service: 08/21/2014. [9214469] (Stanaland, Russell) [Entered: 08/21/2014 03:19 PM] |
| Filing 5 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief and supplemental excerpts of record for review. Submitted by Appellee Edith Mazzaferri. Date of service: 08/19/2014. [9210895] --[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected brief. 08/22/2014 by TL] (Stanaland, Russell) [Entered: 08/19/2014 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 4 Sent Appellees Alec Harrington, Mansueto Anthony Lenci, Edith Mazzaferri, Russell Dale Stanaland and Eric D. Tetrault 31c letter for failure to file answering brief. Response is due 14 days from the date of this notice. [9204885] (LN) [Entered: 08/14/2014 10:30 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed original and 7 copies of Appellant Paul Den Beste (Informal: Yes) opening brief of 25 pages. Served on 04/16/2014. [9063429] (GV) [Entered: 04/18/2014 10:25 AM] |
| Filing 2 Streamlined request by - Paul Den Beste and Appellant Paul Den Beste to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Paul Den Beste opening brief due 04/16/2014. Appellees Alec Harrington, Mansueto Anthony Lenci, Edith Mazzaferri, Russell Dale Stanaland and Eric D. Tetrault answering brief due 05/16/2014. The optional reply brief is due 14 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [9024319] (LBS) [Entered: 03/20/2014 01:19 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Paul Den Beste opening brief due 03/17/2014. Appellees Alec Harrington, Mansueto Anthony Lenci, Edith Mazzaferri, Russell Dale Stanaland and Eric D. Tetrault answering brief due 04/14/2014. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [8891937] (RT) [Entered: 12/06/2013 10:56 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
