Booloon, Inc., et al v. Google, Inc., et al
| BOOLOON, INC., a Delaware Corporation and QIN ZHANG, an individual |
| GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware Corporation, NICK MOTE, an individual, BOSTWICK & JASSY LLP, a California Limited Partnership, GARY BOSTWICK, an individual, JEAN-PAUL JASSY, an individual, KEVIN VICK, an individual, RITA MILLER, an individual, RICHARD D. ALDRICH, an individual, H. WALTER CROSKEY, an individual, JOAN KLEIN and MATTHEW ST. GEORGE |
| 13-56362 |
| August 6, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 39 Received 7 paper copies of Reply brief [37] filed by Qin Zhang. [9159674] (SD) |
| Filing 38 Filed clerk order: The reply brief [37] submitted by Qin Zhang is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: not applicable. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. [9146549] (TLH) |
| Filing 37 Submitted (ECF) Reply Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Qin Zhang. Date of service: 06/25/2014. [9146350] (QZ) |
| Filing 36 Terminated Appellant Booloon, Inc. in 13-56362 [9110705] (WL) |
| Filing 35 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: GS): On May 2, 2014, appellant Booloon, Inc. was directed to have counsel appear on appellant Booloon, Inc.’s behalf. As of May 27, 2014, no counsel has appeared for appellant Booloon, Inc. Therefore appellant Booloon, Inc. is dismissed from this appeal. A copy of this order shall act as and for the mandate of this court as to appellant Booloon, Inc. only. Due to appellant Booloon, Inc.’s dismissed status, the opening brief for appellant Booloon, Inc. submitted on May 23, 2014 is stricken. This appeal shall proceed as to appellant Qin Zhang. Appellant Qin Zhang’s motion to substitute Booloon, Inc. is denied. See Fed. R. App. P. 43. Appellant Qin Zhang’s alternative request to file an amicus curiae brief in the interest of Booloon, Inc. is denied. Appellant Qin Zhang’s request to file multiple reply briefs is denied. Appellant Qin Zhang is reminded that if multiple answering briefs are filed, an appellant or group of jointly represented appellants is limited to filing a single reply brief in response to the multiple answering briefs. See 9th Cir. R. 28-5. Within 28 days appellant Qin Zhang shall submit a single substitute reply brief, not to exceed 8,400 words, that replies to all of the answering briefs. Upon filing of the single substitute reply brief, the previously submitted reply briefs will be stricken. [9110700] (WL) |
| Filing 34 Filed (ECF) Appellant Booloon, Inc. Amended Motion to substitute party. Date of service: 05/27/2014. [9108191] (QZ) |
| Filing 33 Filed (ECF) Appellant Booloon, Inc. Motion to substitute party. Date of service: 05/23/2014. [9108107] (QZ) |
| Filing 32 STRICKEN PER ORDER [35]. Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief and excerpts of record for review. Submitted by Appellant Booloon, Inc.. Date of service: 05/23/2014. [9108106] (QZ) |
| Filing 31 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: GS): The appellants’ motion to file a supplemental reply brief is denied. The appellants are reminded that if multiple answering briefs are filed, an appellant or group of jointly represented appellants is limited to filing a single reply brief in response to the multiple answering briefs. See 9th Cir. R. 28-5. This court’s record does not reflect that Qin Zhang, Esq. is admitted to practice before the Ninth Circuit. See Fed. R. App. P. 46(a)(1). Therefore Qin Zhang, Esq. may not represent appellant corporation Booloon, Inc. See D-Beam Ltd. Partnership v. Roller Derby Skates, Inc., 366 F.3d 972, 973-74 (9th Cir. 2004). Within 21 days after the date of this order, Qin Zhang, Esq. shall: (1) apply for admission to practice before the Ninth Circuit; or (2) cause counsel, who is a member of the bar of the Ninth Circuit, to represent appellant Booloon, Inc. Failure to comply with this order in a timely manner may subject this case to dismissal for failure to prosecute as to the corporate appellant Booloon, Inc. [9081068] (WL) |
| Filing 30 Filed (ECF) Appellant Qin Zhang Motion to file supplemental brief. Date of service: 04/29/2014. [9077054] (QZ) |
| Filing 29 Submitted (ECF) Reply Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Qin Zhang. Date of service: 04/25/2014. [9073575] (QZ) |
| Filing 28 Received 7 paper copies of Answering brief [25] filed by Google, Inc., et al. [9062638] (SD) |
| Filing 27 Filed Appellees Google, Inc., et al. paper copies of supplemental excerpts of record [25] in 1 volume. [9062040] (TLH) |
| Filing 26 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [25] submitted by Google, Inc., et al. is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. The Court has reviewed the supplemental excerpts of record [25] submitted by Google, Inc., et al. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 4 copies of the excerpts in paper format, with a white cover. The paper copies must be in the format described in 9th Circuit Rule 30-1.6. [9055389] (TLH) |
| Filing 25 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief and supplemental excerpts of record for review. Submitted by Appellees Gary Bostwick, Bostwick & Jassy LLP, Google, Inc., Jean-Paul Jassy, Nick Mote and Kevin Vick. Date of service: 04/11/2014. [9055149] (JJ) |
| Filing 24 Received 7 paper copies of Reply brief [22] filed by Qin Zhang. [9045574] (SD) |
| Filing 23 Filed clerk order: The reply brief [22] submitted by Qin Zhang is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: not applicable. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. [9033756] (LA) |
| Filing 22 Submitted (ECF) Reply Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Qin Zhang. Date of service: 03/27/2014. [9033133] (QZ) |
| Filing 21 Received 7 paper copies of Answering brief [18] filed by Richard D. Aldrich, H. Walter Croskey and Rita Miller. [9023172] (DB) |
| Filing 20 Filed Appellees Richard D. Aldrich, H. Walter Croskey and Rita Miller paper copies of supplemental excerpts of record [18] in 1 volume. [9022359] (TLH) |
| Filing 19 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [18] submitted by Richard D. Aldrich, H. Walter Croskey and Rita Miller is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. The Court has reviewed the supplemental excerpts of record [18] submitted by Richard D. Aldrich, H. Walter Croskey and Rita Miller. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 4 copies of the excerpts in paper format, with a white cover. The paper copies must be in the format described in 9th Circuit Rule 30-1.6. [9015937] (TLH) |
| Filing 18 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief and supplemental excerpts of record for review. Submitted by Appellees Richard D. Aldrich, H. Walter Croskey and Rita Miller. Date of service: 03/13/2014. [9014607]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected excerpts. Resent NDA. 03/13/2014 by RY] (KMM) |
| Filing 17 Streamlined request [16] by Appellees Gary Bostwick, Bostwick & Jassy LLP, Google, Inc., Jean-Paul Jassy, Nick Mote and Kevin Vick to extend time to file the answering brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: the answering brief due 04/11/2014. The optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the last-served answering brief. [9004798] [13-56362] (AT) |
| Filing 16 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Answering Brief by Appellees Gary Bostwick, Bostwick & Jassy LLP, Google, Inc., Jean-Paul Jassy, Nick Mote and Kevin Vick. New requested due date is 04/11/2014 at 11:59 pm. [9003534] (JJ) |
| Filing 15 Received 7 paper copies of Opening brief [13] filed by Qin Zhang. [8990398] (SD) |
| Filing 14 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [13] submitted by Qin Zhang is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: not applicable. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. [8978573] (CT) |
| Filing 13 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Qin Zhang. Date of service: 02/12/2014. [8977299] (QZ) |
| Filing 12 Streamlined request [11] by Appellants Booloon, Inc. and Qin Zhang to extend time to file the opening brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: the opening brief is due 02/12/2014. The answering brief is due 03/14/2014. The optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [8932712] [13-56362] (AT) |
| Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants Booloon, Inc. and Qin Zhang. New requested due date is 02/12/2014. [8932434] (QZ) |
| Filing 10 Filed order MEDIATION (CLR): The court has determined that this appeal will not be selected for inclusion in the Mediation Program. All further inquiries regarding this appeal, including requests for extensions of time, should be directed to the Clerk’s office. [8823613] (WL) |
| Filing 9 Added attorney Kevin Vick for Nick Mote Bostwick & Jassy LLP Jean-Paul Jassy Kevin Vick Gary Bostwick. [8795072] (RL) |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Kevin L. Vick for Appellees Gary Bostwick, Bostwick & Jassy LLP, Google, Inc., Jean-Paul Jassy, Nick Mote and Kevin Vick. Date of service: 09/24/2013. [8795036] (KV) |
| Filing 7 Added attorney Jean-Paul Jassy for Jean-Paul Jassy. [8794711] (RL) |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Jean-Paul Jassy for Appellees Gary Bostwick, Bostwick & Jassy LLP, Google, Inc., Jean-Paul Jassy, Nick Mote and Kevin Vick. Date of service: 09/24/2013. [8794420] (JJ) |
| Filing 5 Filed order MEDIATION (VLS): The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. The court has scheduled a telephone settlement assessment conference, with counsel only, on October 16, 2013, at 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC (San Francisco) Time to discuss whether this case is appropriate for participation in the Mediation Program...The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. [8767653] (SM) |
| Filing 4 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 455.00. Date paid: 08/16/2013. [8746842] (BY) |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants Booloon, Inc. and Qin Zhang Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 08/12/2013. [8738571]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached printed to PDF version of questionnaire to correct viewing error. Resent NDA. 08/12/2013 by RY] (QZ) |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: TSP): Order to show cause docket fee due. [8736285] (TSP) |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Fee due from Appellants Booloon, Inc. and Qin Zhang on 08/02/2013. Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/13/2013. Transcript ordered by 09/03/2013. Transcript due 12/02/2013. Appellants Booloon, Inc. and Qin Zhang opening brief due 01/13/2014. Appellees Richard D. Aldrich, Gary Bostwick, Bostwick & Jassy LLP, H. Walter Croskey, Google, Inc., Jean-Paul Jassy, Joan Klein, Rita Miller, Nick Mote, Matthew St. George and Kevin Vick answering brief due 02/12/2014. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [8732491] (JN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.