Utah Koon v. R. Barnes
| UTAH CHARLES KOON |
| R. E. BARNES |
| 14-16547 |
| August 12, 2014 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Filed order (MORGAN B. CHRISTEN and PAUL J. WATFORD) Appellants motion to contest the judgment denial of certificate of appealability is construed as a motion for reconsideration. So construed, the motion is denied. See 9th Cir. R. 27-10; Gen. Ord. 6.11. Any pending motions are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. [9508602] (MS) [Entered: 04/24/2015 02:57 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant Utah Charles Koon motion to reconsider Panel order of the Court filed on 02/18/2015. Deficiencies: No certificate of service. [9462317] (RR) [Entered: 03/18/2015 12:31 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed order (JEROME FARRIS and BARRY G. SILVERMAN) The request for a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2). Any pending motions are denied as moot. [9424604] (RT) [Entered: 02/18/2015 11:05 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Utah Charles Koon motion for certificate of appealability. Deficiencies: None. Served on 12/08/2014. [9352557] (RR) [Entered: 12/17/2014 09:45 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: ME): Appellants October 28, 2014, motion for a second extension of time to file a request for a certificate of appealability is granted. Any request for a certificate of appealability is due by December 8, 2014. [9304281] (ME) [Entered: 11/06/2014 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Utah Charles Koon motion for extension of time. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/23/2014. [9295205] (RR) [Entered: 10/29/2014 04:09 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: ME): Appellants September 15, 2014, motion for an extension of time to file a request for a certificate of appealability is granted. Any request for a certificate of appealability is due by October 22, 2014. The Clerk shall serve appellant a copy of Form CJA 23 with this order. [9249727] (ME) [Entered: 09/23/2014 09:36 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Utah Charles Koon motion for extension of time to file certificate of appealability; motion for IFP. New current address: 1305 Mitchell Ave. Blaine, WA 98280 Deficiencies: No certificate of service. [9242985] --[Edited: Updated Address. 09/17/2014 by TL] (RR) [Entered: 09/16/2014 06:20 PM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 07/21/2014. Record on appeal included: Yes (Electronic:PACER). [9202498] (IV) [Entered: 08/12/2014 02:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Utah Koon v. R. Barnes | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: UTAH CHARLES KOON | |
| Represented By: | Utah Charles Koon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: R. E. BARNES | |
| Represented By: | Rebecca Leigh Whitfield |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
