Kelton Williams v. Phyllis Cheng, et al
| KELTON WILLIAMS |
| PHYLLIS W. CHENG, DFEH Director, OLOPHIUS PERRY, EEOC Director, LOTTIE WOODRUFF, DFEH Employee, MARY BONILLA, DFEH Employee, TIMOTHY M. MUSCAT, DFEH Employee, ELIZABETH RAMIREZ, DFEH Employee, CATHY RAY, DFEH Employee, MONICA REA, DFEH Employee, MARK ALBERT, DFEH Employee, CLAUDIA QUINTANILLA, DFEH Employee, KARRIE MAEDA, EEOC Employee and AMERICAN SPECIALTY HEALTH GROUP, a California corporation, DBA American Specialty Health Networks, Inc. |
| 14-55153 |
| January 27, 2014 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED. (EL, AWT and SPG) [9065402] (RR) [Entered: 04/21/2014 11:13 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (EDWARD LEAVY, A. WALLACE TASHIMA and SUSAN P. GRABER) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [8992399] (WL) [Entered: 02/25/2014 03:10 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Kelton Williams motion for appointment of counsel. Served on 02/01/2014. [8967664] (JFF) [Entered: 02/05/2014 03:50 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Kelton Williams opening brief due 05/05/2014. Appellees Mark Albert, American Specialty Health Group, Mary Bonilla, Phyllis W. Cheng, Karrie Maeda, Timothy M. Muscat, Olophius Perry, Claudia Quintanilla, Elizabeth Ramirez, Cathy Ray, Monica Rea and Lottie Woodruff answering brief due 06/04/2014. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [8954088] (RT) [Entered: 01/27/2014 03:38 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.