Susan Soares v. City of Redondo Beach, et al
| JIM BOOTH, CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, ROGERT CARLBORG and REDONDO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT |
| SUSAN SOARES |
| 14-55806 |
| May 16, 2014 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: EU) Dismissing case for failure to prosecute (Cir. Rule 42-1) Pursuant to Circuit Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to file opening brief. This order served on the district court shall constitute the mandate of this court. [9382846] (EU) [Entered: 01/14/2015 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed Mediation order: This case is not selected for inclusion in the Mediation Program. [9171863] (VS) [Entered: 07/16/2014 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 8 Copy of pro se brief sent to appellant Soares at Jerry Steering Law Offices, 4063 Birch Street Suite 100, New Port Beach, CA 92660. [9163444] (MS) [Entered: 07/10/2014 10:45 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CAG): Counsel Michael D. Kwasigrochs motion to withdraw as counsel of record for appellant Susan Soares is granted. The clerk shall amend court records to reflect appellant is proceeding pro se. A copy of this order shall be provided to appellant at Jerry Steering Law Offices, 4063 Birch Street Suite 100, New Port Beach, CA 92660, attn: Jerry Steering. The current briefing schedule continues to govern this appeal A copy of the pro se brief shall be provided to the appellant under a separate cover. [9163423] (AF) [Entered: 07/10/2014 10:38 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Mediation order: This case is under consideration for inclusion in the Mediation Program. Within 21 days of the date of this order, counsel for all parties intending to file briefs in this matter are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator by email of their clients' views on whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be amenable to settlement presently or in the foreseeable future. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested... This communication should not be filed with the court... The existing briefing schedule remains in effect... [9158351] (VS) [Entered: 07/07/2014 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Susan Soares Motion to withdraw as counsel. Date of service: 07/07/2014. [9157955] (MDK) [Entered: 07/07/2014 12:38 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Susan Soares Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 06/17/2014. [9136332] (MDK) [Entered: 06/17/2014 06:05 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order MEDIATION: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire...dismiss the appeal voluntarily... or show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal pursuant to Ninth Cir. R. 42-1. [9124784] (MS) [Entered: 06/09/2014 01:29 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Susan Soares' Representation Statement. Served on 05/16/2014. [9098197] (JN) [Entered: 05/16/2014 08:20 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/23/2014. Transcript ordered by 06/16/2014. Transcript due 09/15/2014. Appellant Susan Soares opening brief due 10/27/2014. Appellees Jim Booth, Rogert Carlborg, City of Redondo Beach and Redondo Beach Police Department answering brief due 11/26/2014. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [9098196] (JN) [Entered: 05/16/2014 08:18 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
