USA v. Raghvendra Singh
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| RAGHVENDRA SINGH |
| 15-16625 |
| August 17, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Tax Suits |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: ME) Pursuant to Circuit Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to pay fees. This order served on the district court shall constitute the mandate of this court. [9801438] (ME) [Entered: 12/21/2015 04:50 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed order (N. RANDY SMITH and JOHN B. OWENS) Appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied because we find that the appeal is frivolous. If appellant wishes to pursue this appeal despite the courts finding that it is frivolous then, within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall pay $505.00 to the district court as the docketing and filing fees for this appeal and file proof of payment with this court. Otherwise, the appeal will be dismissed by the Clerk for failure to prosecute, regardless of further filings. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. No motions for reconsideration, clarification, or modification of the denial of appellants in forma pauperis status shall be entertained. Because the court has found that this appeal is frivolous, the district court order may be summarily affirmed even if appellant pays the fees. If appellant pays the fees and files proof of such payment in this court, appellant therefore shall simultaneously show cause why the order challenged in this appeal should not be summarily affirmed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of appellants filing. If appellant pays the fees but fails to file a response to this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with this order, the court will not entertain any motion to reinstate the appeal that is not accompanied by proof of payment of the docketing and filing fees and a response to the order to show cause. Briefing remains suspended pending further order of this court. [9759211] (WL) [Entered: 11/17/2015 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Raghvendra Singh motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/01/2015. [9687400] (Walker, Synitha) [Entered: 09/17/2015 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 4 Added attorney Laurie Allyn Snyder for USA, in case 15-16625. [9661478] (Walker, Synitha) [Entered: 08/26/2015 12:49 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Laurie Snyder for Appellee USA. Date of service: 08/26/2015. [9661446] [15-16625] (Snyder, Laurie) [Entered: 08/26/2015 12:18 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [9658037] (CKP) [Entered: 08/24/2015 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Fee due from Appellant Raghvendra Singh on 08/12/2015. Transcript ordered by 09/11/2015. Transcript due 10/13/2015. Appellant Raghvendra Singh opening brief due 11/20/2015. Appellee United States of America answering brief due 12/21/2015. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [9648910] (RT) [Entered: 08/17/2015 10:20 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Raghvendra Singh | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Nithya Senra |
| Represented By: | Laurie Allyn Snyder |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: RAGHVENDRA SINGH | |
| Represented By: | Raghvendra Singh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
