Eric Eleson v. Leland Davis , III, et al
| ERIC RICHARD ELESON |
| LELAND DAVIS III, Superior Court Judge and KAMALA D. HARRIS |
| 15-16646 |
| August 19, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Filed Appellant Eric Richard Eleson letter dated 08/02/2016 re: demand to identify "Judicial Act". Paper filing deficiency: No certificate of service. [10112453] (RR) [Entered: 09/05/2016 01:44 PM] |
| Filing 13 Received courtesy copy of petitioner's petition for writ of certiorari. [9990694] (RR) [Entered: 05/25/2016 11:52 AM] |
| Filing 12 Filed Appellant Eric Richard Eleson letter dated 12/20/2015 re: fraudulent "order" filed 12/15/15. Paper filing deficiency: No further filings per 11/17/15 order. [9808534] (RR) [Entered: 12/29/2015 01:00 PM] |
| Filing 11 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: HMB) On November 17, 2015, this court ordered appellant, within 21 days, to pay the filing fees and show cause why the judgment challenged in this appeal should not be summarily affirmed. The November 17, 2015 order warned appellant that failure to comply would result in the automatic dismissal of the appeal by the Clerk of the Court. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fees for this appeal. The court has received appellants December 8, 2015 filing, which challenges the November 17, 2015 order. Pursuant to the November 17, 2015 order, however, [n]o motions for reconsideration, clarification, or modification of the denial of appellants in forma pauperis status shall be entertained. Therefore, the court will take no action as to the December 8, 2015 filing. Because appellant has not complied with the November 17, 2015 order, this appeal is dismissed for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. Pursuant to the November 17, 2015 order, the court will not entertain any motion to reinstate the appeal that is not accompanied by proof of payment of the docketing and filing fees and a response to the order to show cause. This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court. [9793143] (ANL) [Entered: 12/15/2015 01:17 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed Appellant Eric Richard Eleson letter dated 12/03/2015 re: complaint against Judge Wayne A. Alsup and Justices(s) Fletcher and Smith (Void Orders). Paper filing deficiency: None. [9787354] (RR) [Entered: 12/10/2015 11:05 AM] |
| Filing 9 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 15-16646: Due] ). [9759338] (WL) [Entered: 11/17/2015 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed order (WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and N. RANDY SMITH) The district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. Our review of the record confirms that appellant is not entitled to in forma pauperis status for this appeal because we find the appeal is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). If appellant wishes to pursue this appeal despite the courts finding that it is frivolous then, within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall pay $505.00 to the district court as the docketing and filing fees for this appeal and file proof of payment with this court. Otherwise, the appeal will be dismissed by the Clerk for failure to prosecute, regardless of further filings. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. No motions for reconsideration, clarification, or modification of the denial of appellants in forma pauperis status shall be entertained. Because the court has found that this appeal is frivolous, the district court judgment may be summarily affirmed even if appellant pays the fees. If appellant pays the fees and files proof of such payment in this court, appellant therefore shall simultaneously show cause why the judgment challenged in this appeal should not be summarily affirmed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6. If appellant pays the fees but fails to file a response to this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with this order, the court will not entertain any motion to reinstate the appeal that is not accompanied by proof of payment of the docketing and filing fees and a response to the order to show cause. Appellants September 1, 2015, September 15, 2015, and October 26, 2015 motions are denied. Briefing is suspended pending further order of this court. [9759331] (WL) [Entered: 11/17/2015 03:31 PM] |
| Filing 7 Received Appellant Eric Richard Eleson notice and demand to cease & desist; demand for proof of claim; refused "order," served on 10/20/15. [9736587] (RR) [Entered: 10/28/2015 03:22 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Eric Richard Eleson notice and demand to vacate order of dismissal and "frivolous" determination/revocation of IFP status; order refused for fraud UCC 3-501. Deficiencies: None. [9686398] (RR) [Entered: 09/17/2015 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 5 Copy of letter received from DC addressed to Eric Eleson dated 9/1/15 re: IFP revoked the docketing fee of $505 is now due. [9672945] (RR) [Entered: 09/04/2015 12:45 PM] |
| Filing 4 Received copy of District Court order filed on 09/01/2015. Revoking IP FP Status. [9672936] (RR) [Entered: 09/04/2015 12:38 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Eric Richard Eleson clarification of interlocutory appeal, and inapplicability of 28 USC 1915(a)(3) to said appeal. Deficiencies: None. [9671063] (RR) [Entered: 09/03/2015 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [9653487] (CKP) [Entered: 08/20/2015 12:44 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Eric Richard Eleson opening brief due 11/25/2015. [9651953] (SML) [Entered: 08/19/2015 08:55 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
