Gregory Lyons v. Mike Santana, et al
HILLS, Deputy, individual and official capacity, J. MONARREZ, Sergeant, individual and official capacity, MIKE SANTANA, Deputy, individual and official capacity, RANDY TAYLOR, individual capacity and as Risk Manager for Health-Smart, DBA Pacific Hospital of Long Beach, HINTON, Deputy, individual and official capacity, T. WESTALL, Lieutenant, individual and official capacity, WILLIAMS, Deputy, individual and official capacity, KEITH ALLEN FINK, individual and as attorney for Fink & Steinberg, DAVID GLASIER, in his individual capacity, BLEAU, Deputy, individual and official capacity and OLAF J. MULLER, individual and as Attorney for Fink & Steinberg |
GREGORY ARISTOTLE LYONS |
15-55526 |
April 6, 2015 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (ATG, JF and MTF) [9562210] (JFF) [Entered: 06/04/2015 03:17 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed order (ALFRED T. GOODWIN, JEROME FARRIS and MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [9533516] (AF) [Entered: 05/12/2015 09:47 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF APPELLANT IN PRO SE AND COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 04/27/2015. Transcript due 07/27/2015. Appellant Gregory Aristotle Lyons opening brief due 09/08/2015. Appellees Bleau, Keith Allen Fink, David Glasier, Hills, Hinton, J. Monarrez, Olaf J. Muller, Mike Santana, Randy Taylor, T. Westall and Williams answering brief due 10/08/2015. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [9485365] (BG) [Entered: 04/06/2015 03:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.