Van Nguyen v. Natera, Inc., et al
| MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC, LIGHTSPEED ULTIMATE GENERAL PARTNER VIII LTD, WEDBUSH SECURITIES, INC., ROBERT W. BAIRD & CO. INCORPORATED, COWEN AND COMPANY, LLC, SC XII MANAGEMENT, LLC, PIPER JAFFRAY & CO., SEQUOIA CAPITAL XII, LP and LIGHTSPEED VENTURE PARTNERS VIII, LP |
| ROELOF F. BOTHA, JAMES I. HEALY, EDWARD C. DRISCOLL, Jr., HERM ROSENMAN, JONATHAN SHEENA, MATTHEW RABINOWITZ, NATERA, INC., JOHN STEUART and TODD COZZENS |
| VAN NGUYEN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated |
| 16-16578 |
| September 8, 2016 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 46
Order filed (MARY M. SCHROEDER, JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON and WILLIAM K. SESSIONS, III) The Motion of Defendants-Appellants to Voluntarily Dismiss Consolidated Appeals, filed March 30, 2018, Docket No. [ # 45 ], is GRANTED. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The parties shall bear their own costs and fees. This order shall act as and for the mandate of this court. DISMISSED. [10842939] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (OC) [Entered: 04/19/2018 12:05 PM]
|
| Filing 45 Filed (ECF) Appellants Roelof F. Botha, Todd Cozzens, Edward C. Driscoll, Jr., James I. Healy, Natera, Inc., Matthew Rabinowitz, Herm Rosenman, Jonathan Sheena and John Steuart in 16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579 Unopposed Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 03/30/2018. [10820048] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (Smith, Robert) [Entered: 03/30/2018 06:47 PM] |
| Filing 44 Case came on for submission before MARY M. SCHROEDER, JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON and WILLIAM K. SESSIONS, III SUBMISSION DEFERRED. [10763932] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (EU) [Entered: 02/14/2018 12:00 PM] |
| Filing 43 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: OC): The parties Joint Motion to Continue Hearing of Oral Argument and Hold the Consolidated Appeals in Abeyance is granted. The Order setting the case for argument on February 14, 2018 is vacated. The parties are directed to notify the court when the Supreme Courts decision in Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, 15-1439 (U.S.) is final. [10709791] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (OC) [Entered: 01/02/2018 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 42 Filed (ECF) Appellants Roelof F. Botha, Todd Cozzens, Edward C. Driscoll, Jr., James I. Healy, Natera, Inc., Matthew Rabinowitz, Herm Rosenman, Jonathan Sheena and John Steuart in 16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579 Joint Motion to continue hearing of case, Motion to stay appellate proceedings. Date of service: 12/15/2017. [10692474] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (Smith, Robert) [Entered: 12/15/2017 01:08 PM] |
| Filing 41 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice. Location: San Francisco. Filed by Attorney Mr. Richard Harold Zelichov for Appellants Roelof F. Botha, Todd Cozzens, Edward C. Driscoll, Jr., James I. Healy, Natera, Inc., Matthew Rabinowitz, Herm Rosenman, Jonathan Sheena and John Steuart in 16-16579, Attorney Mr. Richard Harold Zelichov for Appellants Natera, Inc., Matthew Rabinowitz, Jonathan Sheena, Herm Rosenman, Roelof F. Botha, Todd Cozzens, Edward C. Driscoll, Jr., James I. Healy and John Steuart in 16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578. [10688283] [16-16579, 16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578] (Zelichov, Richard) [Entered: 12/12/2017 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 40 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice. Location: San Francisco. Filed by Attorney Andrew Love for Appellee City of Warren Police and Fire Retirement System in 16-16579. [10682189] [16-16579, 16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578] (Love, Andrew) [Entered: 12/07/2017 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 39 Notice of Oral Argument on Wednesday, February 14, 2018 - 09:30 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - San Francisco CA. View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case # here . Be sure to review the # GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing, including when to arrive (30 minutes before the hearing time) and when and how to submit additional citations (filing electronically as far in advance of the hearing as possible). When you have reviewed the calendar, download the # ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE form , complete the form, and file it via Appellate ECF or return the completed form to: SAN FRANCISCO Office. [10678896] (AKM) [Entered: 12/05/2017 01:33 PM] |
| Filing 38 This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for February 2018 and the two subsequent sitting months in that location at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions . If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please inform the court within 3 days of this notice , using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : File Correspondence to Court; Subject : regarding availability for oral argument). When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter within 3 days of this notice , using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : File Correspondence to Court; Subject : request for mediation).[10614357] (AW) [Entered: 10/11/2017 06:11 PM] |
| Filing 37 This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for January 2018 and the two subsequent sitting months in that location at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions . If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please inform the court within 3 days of this notice , using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : File Correspondence to Court; Subject : regarding availability for oral argument). When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter within 3 days of this notice , using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : File Correspondence to Court; Subject : request for mediation).[10593075] (AW) [Entered: 09/25/2017 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 36 Filed (ECF) Appellee City of Warren Police and Fire Retirement System in 16-16579 Correspondence: Regarding availability for oral argument.. Date of service: 08/25/2017 [10559326] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (Love, Andrew) [Entered: 08/25/2017 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 35 This case is being considered for the December 2017 San Francisco oral argument calendar. The exact date of your oral argument has not been determined at this time. The following is a link to the upcoming court sessions: # http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/calendar/sitdates_2017.pdf . Please review these upcoming dates immediately to determine if you have any conflicts with them. If you do have conflicts, please inform the Court within 3 days of this notice by sending a letter to the Court using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : File Correspondence to Court; Subject : regarding availability for oral argument). The Court discourages motions to continue after this 3-day period. The clerk's office takes conflict dates into consideration in scheduling oral arguments but cannot guarantee that every request will be honored. Your case will be assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. Note that your case will be set for hearing in due course if it is not assigned to this calendar. In addition, if parties would like to discuss settlement before argument is scheduled, they should jointly request a referral to the mediation unit. Such a referral will postpone the calendaring of oral argument. All such requests must be made within 3 days of this notice by sending a letter to the Court using CM/ECF (Type of Document: File Correspondence to Court; Subject: request for mediation). Once the case is calendared, it is unlikely that the court will postpone argument for settlement discussions.[10556198] (AW) [Entered: 08/24/2017 08:41 AM] |
| Filing 34 Received 7 paper copies of Reply Brief [ # 30 ] filed by Roelof F. Botha, Todd Cozzens, Edward C. Driscoll, Jr., James I. Healy, Natera, Inc., Matthew Rabinowitz, Herm Rosenman, Jonathan Sheena and John Steuart in 16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579. [10538789] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (RG) [Entered: 08/09/2017 01:13 PM] |
| Filing 33 Filed 4 paper copies of further excerpts of record [ # 31 ] in 1 volume(s) filed by Appellants. [10538562] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (SML) [Entered: 08/09/2017 11:30 AM] |
| Filing 32 Filed clerk order: The reply brief [ # 30 ] submitted by appellants is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: gray. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate CM/ECF. The Court has reviewed the further excerpts of record [ # 31 ] submitted by appellants. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 4 copies of the excerpts in paper format, with a white cover. The paper copies must be in the format described in 9th Circuit Rule 30-1.6. [10535765] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (SML) [Entered: 08/07/2017 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 31 Submitted (ECF) further excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellants Roelof F. Botha, Todd Cozzens, Edward C. Driscoll, Jr., James I. Healy, Natera, Inc., Matthew Rabinowitz, Herm Rosenman, Jonathan Sheena and John Steuart in 16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579. Date of service: 08/07/2017. [10535389] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (Smith, Robert) [Entered: 08/07/2017 12:58 PM] |
| Filing 30 Submitted (ECF) Reply Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Roelof F. Botha, Todd Cozzens, Edward C. Driscoll, Jr., James I. Healy, Natera, Inc., Matthew Rabinowitz, Herm Rosenman, Jonathan Sheena and John Steuart in 16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579. Date of service: 08/07/2017. [10535384] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (Smith, Robert) [Entered: 08/07/2017 12:55 PM] |
| Filing 29 Received 7 paper copies of Answering Brief [ # 25 ] filed by M. Jim Ellis., et al. [10490790] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (RG) [Entered: 06/28/2017 11:39 AM] |
| Filing 28 Streamlined request [27] by Appellants Roelof F. Botha, Todd Cozzens, Edward C. Driscoll, Jr., James I. Healy, Natera, Inc., Matthew Rabinowitz, Herm Rosenman, Jonathan Sheena and John Steuart in 16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579 to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: the consolidated optional reply brief is due 08/07/2017. [10490133] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (JN) [Entered: 06/27/2017 04:32 PM] |
| Filing 27 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Reply Brief by Appellants Roelof F. Botha, Todd Cozzens, Edward C. Driscoll, Jr., James I. Healy, Natera, Inc., Matthew Rabinowitz, Herm Rosenman, Jonathan Sheena and John Steuart in 16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579. New requested due date is 08/07/2017. [10490059] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (Werlinger, Eric) [Entered: 06/27/2017 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 26 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 25 ] submitted by M. Jim Ellis, et al.,is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate CM/ECF. [10486595] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (GV) [Entered: 06/23/2017 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 25 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Appellee M Jim Ellis in 16-16576, Appellee Mika Cahoj in 16-16577, Appellee Van Nguyen in 16-16578, Appellee City of Warren Police and Fire Retirement System in 16-16579. Date of service: 06/23/2017. [10485737] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (Love, Andrew) [Entered: 06/23/2017 10:40 AM] |
| Filing 24 Terminated Kathleen A. Herkenhoff for M Jim Ellis in 16-16576 [10471091] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (RL) [Entered: 06/13/2017 12:00 PM] |
| Filing 23 Filed (ECF) Appellee M Jim Ellis in 16-16576 Correspondence: Notice of withdrawal of Kathleen A. Herkenhoff as counsel of record for Plaintiff-Appellee M. Jim Ellis.. Date of service: 06/13/2017 [10471053] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (Ficaro, James) [Entered: 06/13/2017 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 22 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LBS): Appellees unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 21 ]) for an extension of time to file the consolidated answering brief is granted. The consolidated answering brief is due June 23, 2017. The consolidated optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the consolidated answering brief. [10403418] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (HH) [Entered: 04/19/2017 04:35 PM] |
| Filing 21 Filed (ECF) Appellee City of Warren Police and Fire Retirement System in 16-16579 Unopposed Motion to extend time to file Answering brief until 06/23/2017. Date of service: 04/12/2017. [10393600] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (Love, Andrew) [Entered: 04/12/2017 01:52 PM] |
| Filing 20 Filed four paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 17 ] in 1 volume(s) filed by Appellants Roelof F. Botha, et al., [10381679] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (GV) [Entered: 04/03/2017 04:11 PM] |
| Filing 19 Received 7 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 16 ] filed by Roelof F. Botha, Todd Cozzens, Edward C. Driscoll, Jr., James I. Healy, Natera, Inc., Matthew Rabinowitz, Herm Rosenman, Jonathan Sheena and John Steuart in 16-16576. [10380426] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (RG) [Entered: 04/03/2017 09:50 AM] |
| Filing 18 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 16 ] submitted by Roelof F. Botha, et al., is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: blue. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate CM/ECF. The Court has reviewed the excerpts of record [ # 17 ] submitted by Roelof F. Botha, et al. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 4 copies of the excerpts in paper format, with a white cover. The paper copies must be in the format described in 9th Circuit Rule 30-1.6. [10373838] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (GV) [Entered: 03/28/2017 09:23 AM] |
| Filing 17 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellants Roelof F. Botha, Todd Cozzens, Edward C. Driscoll, Jr., James I. Healy, Natera, Inc., Matthew Rabinowitz, Herm Rosenman, Jonathan Sheena and John Steuart in 16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579. Date of service: 03/24/2017. [10370513] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (Smith, Robert) [Entered: 03/24/2017 11:39 AM] |
| Filing 16 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Roelof F. Botha, Todd Cozzens, Edward C. Driscoll, Jr., James I. Healy, Natera, Inc., Matthew Rabinowitz, Herm Rosenman, Jonathan Sheena and John Steuart in 16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579. Date of service: 03/24/2017. [10370490] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (Smith, Robert) [Entered: 03/24/2017 11:31 AM] |
| Filing 15 Streamlined request [14] by Appellants Roelof F. Botha, Todd Cozzens, Edward C. Driscoll, Jr., James I. Healy, Natera, Inc., Matthew Rabinowitz, Herm Rosenman, Jonathan Sheena and John Steuart in 16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579 to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants Roelof F. Botha, Todd Cozzens, Edward C. Driscoll Jr., James I. Healy, Natera, Inc., Matthew Rabinowitz, Herm Rosenman, Jonathan Sheena and John Steuart consolidated opening brief due 03/24/2017. Appellees M Jim Ellis, Mika Cahoj, Van Nguyen and City of Warren Police and Fire Retirement System consolidated answering brief due 04/24/2017. The consolidated optional reply brief is due 14 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [10319306] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (JN) [Entered: 02/14/2017 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 14 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants Roelof F. Botha, Todd Cozzens, Edward C. Driscoll, Jr., James I. Healy, Natera, Inc., Matthew Rabinowitz, Herm Rosenman, Jonathan Sheena and John Steuart in 16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579. New requested due date is 03/24/2017. [10319004] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (Werlinger, Eric) [Entered: 02/14/2017 12:31 PM] |
| Filing 13 Added attorney Eric Thomas Werlinger, Robert Thomas Smith for James I. Healy Jonathan Sheena Todd Cozzens Edward C. Driscoll Jr. Natera, Inc. Herm Rosenman Matthew Rabinowitz John Steuart Roelof F. Botha, in case 16-16576 Eric Thomas Werlinger, Robert Thomas Smith for James I. Healy Jonathan Sheena Todd Cozzens Edward C. Driscoll Jr. Natera, Inc. Herm Rosenman Matthew Rabinowitz John Steuart Roelof F. Botha, in case 16-16577 Eric Thomas Werlinger, Robert Thomas Smith for James I. Healy Jonathan Sheena Todd Cozzens Edward C. Driscoll Jr. Natera, Inc. Herm Rosenman Matthew Rabinowitz John Steuart Roelof F. Botha, in case 16-16578 Eric Thomas Werlinger, Robert Thomas Smith for James I. Healy Jonathan Sheena Todd Cozzens Edward C. Driscoll Jr. Natera, Inc. Herm Rosenman Matthew Rabinowitz John Steuart Roelof F. Botha, in case 16-16579. [10317823] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (RR) [Entered: 02/13/2017 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 12 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Eric Thomas Werlinger for Appellants Roelof F. Botha, Todd Cozzens, Edward C. Driscoll, Jr., James I. Healy, Natera, Inc., Matthew Rabinowitz, Herm Rosenman, Jonathan Sheena and John Steuart in 16-16576, 16-16578, 16-16577, 16-16579. Date of service: 02/13/2017. [10317164] [16-16576, 16-16578, 16-16577, 16-16579] (Werlinger, Eric) [Entered: 02/13/2017 12:10 PM] |
| Filing 11 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Robert Thomas Smith for Appellants Natera, Inc., Roelof F. Botha, Todd Cozzens, Edward C. Driscoll, Jr., James I. Healy, Matthew Rabinowitz, Herm Rosenman, Jonathan Sheena and John Steuart in 16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579. Date of service: 02/13/2017. [10316971] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (Smith, Robert) [Entered: 02/13/2017 11:16 AM] |
| Filing 10 Filed order (EDWARD LEAVY and BARRY G. SILVERMAN) Appellees motion to dismiss appeal No. 16-16579 for lack of jurisdiction (Docket Entry No. [ # 10128519-2 ] in No. 16-16579) is denied. Appellants motion for leave to file a surreply in appeal No. 16-16579 (Docket Entry No. [ # 10169827-2 ] in No. 16-16579) is granted. Appellants motions for leave to file a surreply in support of the response to this courts order to show cause (Docket Entry No. [ # 10169766-2 ] in Nos. 16-16576, [ # 10169812-2 ] in16-16577, and [ # 8 ] in 16-16578) are construed as motions to supplement the responses to the orders to show cause and are granted. The court has received and reviewed the responses to this courts orders to show cause in Nos. 16-16576, 16-16577, and 16-16578. The orders to show cause are discharged. Appellants motions to consolidate (Docket Entry No. [ # 10130213-2 ] in No. 16-16576, Docket Entry No. [ # 10130234-2 ] in Nos. 16-16577 and [ # 3 ] in 16-16578, and Docket Entry No. [ # 10130270-2 ] in No. 16-16579) are granted. Appeal Nos. 16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, and 16- 16579 are consolidated. The consolidated opening brief and excerpts of record are due February 22, 2017; the consolidated answering brief is due March 24, 2017; and the consolidated optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief. In addition to any issues the parties may wish to address, the parties are directed to brief whether this court has jurisdiction to hear these consolidated appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1447(d). See Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca, 516 U.S. 124 (1995). [10265067] [16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579] (WL) [Entered: 01/13/2017 10:30 AM] |
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellants Roelof F. Botha, Todd Cozzens, Edward C. Driscoll, Jr., James I. Healy, Natera, Inc., Matthew Rabinowitz, Herm Rosenman, Jonathan Sheena and John Steuart Correspondence: Surreply In Support Of Appellate Jurisdiction. Date of service: 10/21/2016. [10169843] [16-16578]--[COURT UPDATE: Edited docket text to reflect content of filing. 10/26/2016 by RY] (Zelichov, Richard) [Entered: 10/21/2016 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellants Roelof F. Botha, Todd Cozzens, James I. Healy, Natera, Inc., Matthew Rabinowitz, Herm Rosenman, Jonathan Sheena, John Steuart and Edward C. Driscoll, Jr. Motion for miscellaneous relief [Motion For Leave To File A Surreply In Support Of Appellate Jurisdiction]. Date of service: 10/21/2016. [10169820] [16-16578] (Zelichov, Richard) [Entered: 10/21/2016 03:56 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Mediation order: This case is NOT SELECTED for inclusion in the Mediation Program. Counsel may contact circuit mediator to discuss services available through the court's mediation program, to request a settlement assessment conf, or to request a stay of the appeal for settlement purposes. Also, upon agreement of the parties, the brfing sch can be modified or vacated to facilitate settlement discussions. Csl are requested to send copies of this order to their clients. Info regarding the mediation program may be found at www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [10169230] (CL) [Entered: 10/21/2016 12:12 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellants Roelof F. Botha, Todd Cozzens, Edward C. Driscoll, Jr., James I. Healy, Natera, Inc., Matthew Rabinowitz, Herm Rosenman, Jonathan Sheena and John Steuart response to order to show cause dated 09/26/2016. Date of service: 10/03/2016. [10147111] [16-16578] (Zelichov, Richard) [Entered: 10/03/2016 07:40 PM] |
| Filing 5 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Incorrect ECF filing. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 6 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellants Roelof F. Botha, Todd Cozzens, Edward C. Driscoll, Jr., James I. Healy, Natera, Inc., Matthew Rabinowitz, Herm Rosenman, Jonathan Sheena and John Steuart response supporting motion ([ # 4 ] Clerk Order for order to show cause, [ # 4 ] Clerk Order to vacate briefing schedule, [ # 4 ] Clerk Order). Date of service: 10/03/2016. [10147108] [16-16578] (Zelichov, Richard) [Entered: 10/03/2016 07:33 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: ELF): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal because an order remanding a removed action to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or a defect in removal procedure is generally not reviewable on appeal or otherwise. See 28 U.S.C. 1447(d); Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca, 516 U.S. 124, 127 (1995) (28 U.S.C. 1447(d) generally bars review of an order remanding an action to state court regardless of the statutory basis on which the action was originally removed); see also 15 U.S.C. 77v(a). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellants shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants elect to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [10137589] (HC) [Entered: 09/26/2016 04:08 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants Natera, Inc., Matthew Rabinowitz, Herm Rosenman, Jonathan Sheena, Roelof F. Botha, Todd Cozzens, Edward C. Driscoll, Jr., James I. Healy and John Steuart Unopposed Motion to consolidate cases 16-16576, 16-16577, 16-16578, 16-16579. Date of service: 09/20/2016. [10130250] [16-16578] (Zelichov, Richard) [Entered: 09/20/2016 04:08 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Natera, Inc., Matthew Rabinowitz, Herm Rosenman, Jonathan Sheena, Roelof F. Botha, Todd Cozzens, Edward C. Driscoll, Jr., James I. Healy and John Steuart Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/15/2016. [10125680] [16-16578] (Zelichov, Richard) [Entered: 09/15/2016 07:23 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 09/15/2016. Appellants Roelof F. Botha, Todd Cozzens, Edward C. Driscoll Jr., James I. Healy, Natera, Inc., Matthew Rabinowitz, Herm Rosenman, Jonathan Sheena and John Steuart opening brief due 12/16/2016. Appellee Van Nguyen answering brief due 01/17/2017. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [10116134] (IV) [Entered: 09/08/2016 10:09 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
