E. V. v. Eugene Robinson, Jr., et al
E. V. |
EUGENE H. ROBINSON, Jr., Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Marine Corps, in his capacity as Military Judge and DAVID A. MARTINEZ, Sergeant, U.S. Marine Corps., as Indispensable Party |
16-16975 |
October 28, 2016 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other Statutory Actions |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: E. V. v. Eugene Robinson, Jr., et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant,: E. V. | |
Represented By: | Peter Coote |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee,: EUGENE H. ROBINSON, Jr., Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Marine Corps, in his capacity as Military Judge | |
Represented By: | Gregory Thomas Broderick |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee,: DAVID A. MARTINEZ, Sergeant, U.S. Marine Corps., as Indispensable Party | |
Represented By: | Gregory Thomas Broderick |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.