Kayleigh Slusher, et al v. City of Napa, et al
| KAYLEIGH SLUSHER, Deceased, Through Her Successor In Interest Jason Slusher, JASON SLUSHER, ROBIN SLUSHER and BENNY SLUSHER |
| CITY OF NAPA, a public entity, GARRETT WADE, Napa Police Officer, DEGUILIO, Napa Police Officer, ROBERT CHAMBERS, Napa Police Officer, GARRETT SMITH, Napa Police Officer, JOSHUA SMITH, Napa Police Officer, COUNTY OF NAPA, a public entity, NANCY LEFLER, Napa County Child Welfare Services Social Worker and ROCIO DIAZ-LARA, Napa County Child Welfare Services Worker |
| 16-17304 |
| December 21, 2016 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 49 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: SL): Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (Docket Entry No. [ # 48 ]), this appeal is voluntarily dismissed. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys fees on appeal. A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. [11128502] (AF) [Entered: 12/20/2018 01:30 PM] |
| Filing 48 Filed (ECF) Appellants Jason Slusher, Kayleigh Slusher, Robin Slusher and Benny Slusher Stipulated Motion to dismiss the case. Date of service: 12/20/2018. [11127591] [16-17304] (Sherwin, Julia) [Entered: 12/20/2018 09:37 AM] |
| Filing 47 Filed (ECF) Appellants Benny Slusher, Jason Slusher, Kayleigh Slusher and Robin Slusher status report (as required by Court order dated 10/25/2018). Date of service: 12/12/2018 [11118405] [16-17304] (Sherwin, Julia) [Entered: 12/12/2018 12:03 PM] |
| Filing 46 Filed order MEDIATION (CLB): By December 17, 2018, appellants shall file either a motion to dismiss this appeal or a request that the court calendar the appeal for oral argument. [11060184] (AF) [Entered: 10/25/2018 11:53 AM] |
| Filing 45 Filed (ECF) Appellants Jason Slusher, Kayleigh Slusher and Robin Slusher status report (as required by Court order dated 09/07/2018). Date of service: 10/22/2018 [11054674] [16-17304] (Sherwin, Julia) [Entered: 10/22/2018 09:22 AM] |
| Filing 44 Filed order MEDIATION (CLB): By October 22, 2018, appellants shall file either a motion to dismiss this appeal or a request that the court calendar the appeal for oral argument. [11004853] (AF) [Entered: 09/07/2018 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 43 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 09/05/2018, 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time. See order for details. [10965098] (BLS) [Entered: 08/03/2018 10:32 AM] |
| Filing 42 Attorney Gregory Foster Dyer, substituted by Attorney Bonnie A. Hamilton, in 16-17304. [10900233] (HH) [Entered: 06/07/2018 12:04 PM] |
| Filing 41 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Bonnie A. Hamilton for Appellees County of Napa, Rocio Diaz-Lara and Nancy Lefler. Date of service: 06/07/2018. [10900200] [16-17304] (Hamilton, Bonnie) [Entered: 06/07/2018 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 40 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE - 06/25/2018. See order for details. [10850263] (BLS) [Entered: 04/25/2018 12:34 PM] |
| Filing 39 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE - 04/23/2018. See order for details. [10790279] (BLS) [Entered: 03/07/2018 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 38 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE - 03/06/2018. See order for details. [10740197] (BLS) [Entered: 01/26/2018 12:38 PM] |
| Filing 37 Terminated Thomas Kennedy Helm for Robin Slusher, Kayleigh Slusher, Jason Slusher and Benny Slusher in 16-17304 (Due to incorrect ECF account information). [10676565] (SLM) [Entered: 12/04/2017 12:39 PM] |
| Filing 36 Terminated Mark A. Jones for Nancy Lefler, Rocio Diaz-Lara and County of Napa in 16-17304 - RETIRED [10640823] (SLM) [Entered: 11/02/2017 09:28 AM] |
| Filing 35 Filed order MEDIATION (CLB): The parties' stipulation filed October 24, 2017, is construed as a stipulated motion to refer this matter to the Court's Mediation Unit. So construed, the motion is granted. This matter is referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler of the Northern District of California for a settlement conference. The parties shall submit a joint confidential status report to the undersigned at ([email protected]) within 90 days of the entry of this order. [10630508] (AF) [Entered: 10/25/2017 08:43 AM] |
| Filing 34 Filed (ECF) Appellants Benny Slusher, Jason Slusher, Kayleigh Slusher and Robin Slusher Correspondence: Stipulation and (Proposed) Order for Settlement Conference with United States Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. The parties jointly request a settlement conference with Judge Beeler before oral argument is scheduled.. Date of service: 10/24/2017 [10629342] [16-17304] (Sherwin, Julia) [Entered: 10/24/2017 11:08 AM] |
| Filing 33 Filed (ECF) Appellees Robert Chambers, City of Napa, Deguilio, Garrett Smith, Joshua Smith and Garrett Wade Correspondence: Regarding availability for oral argument. Date of service: 10/16/2017 [10619427] [16-17304] (Fox, Gregory) [Entered: 10/16/2017 03:49 PM] |
| Filing 32 Filed (ECF) Appellee County of Napa Correspondence: Regarding availability for oral argument. Date of service: 10/16/2017 [10618738] [16-17304] (Dyer, Gregory) [Entered: 10/16/2017 11:52 AM] |
| Filing 31 Filed (ECF) Appellants Benny Slusher, Jason Slusher, Kayleigh Slusher and Robin Slusher Correspondence: Regarding Availability for Oral Argument. Date of service: 10/13/2017 [10617072] [16-17304] (Helm, Thomas) [Entered: 10/13/2017 12:14 PM] |
| Filing 30 This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for February 2018 and the two subsequent sitting months in that location at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions . If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please inform the court within 3 days of this notice , using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : File Correspondence to Court; Subject : regarding availability for oral argument). When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter within 3 days of this notice , using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : File Correspondence to Court; Subject : request for mediation).[10614159] (AW) [Entered: 10/11/2017 05:23 PM] |
| Filing 29 Received 7 paper copies of Reply Brief [ # 27 ] filed by appellants. [10526908] (SD) [Entered: 07/31/2017 11:40 AM] |
| Filing 28 Filed clerk order: The reply brief [ # 27 ] submitted by appellants is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: gray. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate CM/ECF. [10521286] (LA) [Entered: 07/25/2017 04:30 PM] |
| Filing 27 Submitted (ECF) Reply Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Benny Slusher, Jason Slusher, Kayleigh Slusher and Robin Slusher. Date of service: 07/24/2017. [10518743] [16-17304] (Helm, Thomas) [Entered: 07/24/2017 12:17 PM] |
| Filing 26 Received 7 paper copies of Answering Brief [ # 18 ] filed by City of Napa, et al. [10501137] (SD) [Entered: 07/07/2017 01:34 PM] |
| Filing 25 Streamlined request [24] by Appellants Benny Slusher, Jason Slusher, Kayleigh Slusher and Robin Slusher to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: the optional reply brief is due 8/11/17. [10499314] (LW) [Entered: 07/06/2017 12:19 PM] |
| Filing 24 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Reply Brief by Appellants Benny Slusher, Jason Slusher, Kayleigh Slusher and Robin Slusher. New requested due date is 08/11/2017. [10498795] [16-17304] (Helm, Thomas) [Entered: 07/06/2017 09:28 AM] |
| Filing 23 Received 7 paper copies of Answering Brief [ # 21 ] filed by County of Napa, et al. [10496092] (SD) [Entered: 07/03/2017 01:46 PM] |
| Filing 22 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 21 ] submitted by County of Napa, et al. is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate CM/ECF. [10493575] (GWL) [Entered: 06/30/2017 09:12 AM] |
| Filing 21 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Appellees County of Napa, Rocio Diaz-Lara and Nancy Lefler. Date of service: 06/29/2017. [10493057] [16-17304] (Dyer, Gregory) [Entered: 06/29/2017 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 20 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 18 ] submitted by City of Napa, et al. is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate CM/ECF. [10492930] (GWL) [Entered: 06/29/2017 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 19 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 21 ]. Original Text: Submitted (ECF) Reply Brief for review. Submitted by Appellees County of Napa, Rocio Diaz-Lara and Nancy Lefler. Date of service: 06/29/2017. [10492235] [16-17304] (Dyer, Gregory) [Entered: 06/29/2017 10:53 AM] |
| Filing 18 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Appellees Robert Chambers, City of Napa, Deguilio, Garrett Smith, Joshua Smith and Garrett Wade. Date of service: 06/28/2017. [10491809] [16-17304] (Fox, Gregory) [Entered: 06/28/2017 05:32 PM] |
| Filing 16 Streamlined request [15] by Appellees Robert Chambers, City of Napa, Deguilio, Joshua Smith and Garrett Wade to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellees Robert Chambers, City of Napa, County of Napa, Deguilio, Rocio Diaz-Lara, Nancy Lefler, Garrett Smith, Joshua Smith and Garrett Wade answering brief due 06/29/2017. The optional reply brief is due 14 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [10421298] (LW) [Entered: 05/03/2017 04:48 PM] |
| Filing 15 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Answering Brief by Appellees City of Napa, Robert Chambers, Deguilio, Garrett Wade, Joshua Smith and Garrett Smith. New requested due date is 06/26/2017. [10420200] [16-17304] (Fox, Gregory) [Entered: 05/03/2017 10:36 AM] |
| Filing 17 Filed 4 paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 12 ] in 2 volume(s) filed by Appellants. [10421844] (ANL) [Entered: 05/04/2017 10:43 AM] |
| Filing 14 Received 7 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 11 ] filed by appellants. [10419484] (SD) [Entered: 05/02/2017 03:54 PM] |
| Filing 13 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 11 ] submitted by appellants is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: blue. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate CM/ECF. The Court has reviewed the excerpts of record [ # 12 ] submitted by appellants. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 4 copies of the excerpts in paper format, with a white cover. The paper copies must be in the format described in 9th Circuit Rule 30-1.6. [10415607] (ANL) [Entered: 04/28/2017 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 12 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellants Benny Slusher, Jason Slusher, Kayleigh Slusher and Robin Slusher. Date of service: 04/27/2017. [10413230] [16-17304] (Helm, Thomas) [Entered: 04/27/2017 09:59 AM] |
| Filing 11 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Benny Slusher, Jason Slusher, Kayleigh Slusher and Robin Slusher. Date of service: 04/27/2017. [10413213] [16-17304] (Helm, Thomas) [Entered: 04/27/2017 09:56 AM] |
| Filing 10 Added attorney Joanne Tran for Garrett Wade City of Napa Garrett Smith Robert Chambers Joshua Smith, in case 16-17304. [10394237] (CW) [Entered: 04/13/2017 07:17 AM] |
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Joanne Tran for Appellees Robert Chambers, City of Napa, Deguilio, Garrett Smith, Joshua Smith and Garrett Wade. Date of service: 04/12/2017. [10394083] [16-17304] (Tran, Joanne) [Entered: 04/12/2017 04:54 PM] |
| Filing 8 Streamlined request [7] by Appellants Benny Slusher, Jason Slusher, Kayleigh Slusher and Robin Slusher to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants Benny Slusher, Jason Slusher, Kayleigh Slusher and Robin Slusher opening brief due 04/27/2017. Appellees Robert Chambers, City of Napa, County of Napa, Deguilio, Rocio Diaz-Lara, Nancy Lefler, Garrett Smith, Joshua Smith and Garrett Wade answering brief due 05/30/2017. The optional reply brief is due 14 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [10360113] (LW) [Entered: 03/16/2017 03:55 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants Robin Slusher, Kayleigh Slusher, Jason Slusher and Benny Slusher. New requested due date is 04/27/2017. [10359801] [16-17304] (Sorensen, Maya) [Entered: 03/16/2017 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Mediation order: This case is not selected for inclusion in the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant further settlement discussions. [10271898] (CL) [Entered: 01/19/2017 01:01 PM] |
| Filing 5 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 4 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellee County of Napa Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/28/2016. [10248833] [16-17304] (Preston, Kristen) [Entered: 12/28/2016 05:13 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellee County of Napa Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/28/2016. [10248819] [16-17304]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached certificate of service. 12/29/2016 by SLM] (Preston, Kristen) [Entered: 12/28/2016 05:01 PM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - Assessment Conference, 01/19/2017, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [10248390] (VS) [Entered: 12/28/2016 01:59 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Benny Slusher, Jason Slusher, Kayleigh Slusher and Robin Slusher Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/22/2016. [10244073] [16-17304] (Helm, Thomas) [Entered: 12/22/2016 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 12/28/2016. Transcript ordered by 01/19/2017. Transcript due 02/17/2017. Appellants Benny Slusher, Jason Slusher, Kayleigh Slusher and Robin Slusher opening brief due 03/28/2017. Appellees Robert Chambers, City of Napa, County of Napa, Deguilio, Rocio Diaz-Lara, Nancy Lefler, Garrett Smith, Joshua Smith and Garrett Wade answering brief due 04/28/2017. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [10242301] (RT) [Entered: 12/21/2016 02:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
