USA v. Ammon Bundy
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| AMMON E. BUNDY |
| 17-10402 |
| September 15, 2017 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MANDATE ISSUED. (KMW, RMG and PJW) [10641604] [17-10394, 17-10395, 17-10396, 17-10397, 17-10398, 17-10399, 17-10402, 17-10404] (RL) [Entered: 11/02/2017 02:02 PM] |
| Filing 11 Filed order (KIM MCLANE WARDLAW, RONALD M. GOULD and PAUL J. WATFORD) Upon review of the responses to this courts September 21, 2017 order to show cause, we dismiss these consolidated appeals of the magistrate judges September 1, 2017 pre-trial detention order for lack of jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; see also 18 U.S.C. 3145(b); Fed. R. App. P. 9(a). DISMISSED. [10613706] [17-10394, 17-10395, 17-10396, 17-10397, 17-10398, 17-10399, 17-10402, 17-10404] (RT) [Entered: 10/11/2017 03:09 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellee USA in 17-10394, 17-10395, 17-10404, 17-10402, 17-10399, 17-10398, 17-10397, 17-10396 reply to response to order to show cause dated 09/21/2017. Date of service: 09/28/2017. [10597805] [17-10394, 17-10395, 17-10404, 17-10402, 17-10399, 17-10398, 17-10397, 17-10396] (White, Elizabeth) [Entered: 09/28/2017 11:12 AM] |
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellant Melvin D. Bundy in 17-10396 Joint Motion for miscellaneous relief [Motion to Show Cause]. Date of service: 09/27/2017. [10597037] [17-10394, 17-10395, 17-10396, 17-10397, 17-10398, 17-10399, 17-10402, 17-10404] (Gaffney, Lucas) [Entered: 09/27/2017 04:13 PM] |
| Filing 8 Criminal Justice Act electronic voucher created. (Counsel: Daniel Hill for Ammon E. Bundy in 17-10402) [10596344] [17-10402, 17-10394, 17-10395, 17-10396, 17-10397, 17-10398, 17-10399, 17-10404] (TG) [Entered: 09/27/2017 12:08 PM] |
| Filing 7 Criminal Justice Act electronic voucher created. (Counsel: Ms. Kristine Kuzemka, Esquire for Jason D. Woods in 17-10399) [10594958] [17-10399, 17-10394, 17-10395, 17-10396, 17-10397, 17-10398, 17-10402, 17-10404] (BJK) [Entered: 09/26/2017 02:23 PM] |
| Filing 6 Criminal Justice Act electronic voucher created. (Counsel: Andrea Lee Luem for Joseph D. O'Shaughnessy in 17-10398) [10594901] [17-10398, 17-10394, 17-10395, 17-10396, 17-10397, 17-10399, 17-10402, 17-10404] (BJK) [Entered: 09/26/2017 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 5 Criminal Justice Act electronic voucher created. (Counsel: Mr. Mace Yampolsky, Esquire for Brian D. Cavalier in 17-10397) [10594807] [17-10397, 17-10394, 17-10395, 17-10396, 17-10398, 17-10399, 17-10402, 17-10404] (BJK) [Entered: 09/26/2017 01:35 PM] |
| Filing 4 Criminal Justice Act electronic voucher created. (Counsel: Mr. Lucas James Gaffney, Esquire for Melvin D. Bundy and Melvin D. Bundy in 17-10396) [10594749] [17-10396, 17-10394, 17-10395, 17-10397, 17-10398, 17-10399, 17-10402, 17-10404] (BJK) [Entered: 09/26/2017 01:15 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: FG): The September 20, 2017 order is vacated as issued in error. The unopposed request by appellant Melvin Bundy in appeal No. 17-10396 to consolidate appeal Nos. 17-10394, 17-10395, 17-10396, 17-10397, 17-10398, 17-10399, 17-10402, and 17-10404 (Docket Entry No. [ # 10585454-2 ] in appeal No. 17-10396) is granted. The Clerk shall consolidate these appeals. The record reflects that these consolidated appeals are from the magistrate judges September 1, 2017 order denying appellants emergency motion for release. This court may lack jurisdiction over these appeals because appeals from orders relating to the release or detention of individuals charged with federal crimes are governed by 28 U.S.C. 1291, which provides that this court shall have jurisdiction over all final decisions of the district courts of the United States. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. The magistrate judges pretrial detention order therefore does not appear to be final for purposes of 1291 because it is subject to review by the district court. See 18 U.S.C. 3145(b); Fed. R. App. P. 9(a). Within 6 days after the date of this order, appellants shall show cause, either in one joint filing or in individual filings, why these consolidated appeals should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction or shall move for voluntary dismissal of these consolidated appeals. If appellants elect to show cause, appellee may file a reply within 3 days after service of any response. If any appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss the relevant appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspending pending further order. If necessary, the court will set a briefing schedule upon resolution of this order to show cause. [10589988] [17-10394, 17-10395, 17-10396, 17-10397, 17-10398, 17-10399, 17-10402, 17-10404] (RT) [Entered: 09/21/2017 05:02 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: FG): The unopposed request by appellant Melvin Bundy in appeal No. 17-10396 to consolidate appeal Nos. 17-10394, 17-10395, 17-10396, 17-10397, 17-10398, 17-10399, 17-10402, and 17-10404 (Docket Entry No. [ # 10585454-2 ] in appeal No. 17-10396) is granted. The Clerk shall consolidate these appeals. The record reflects that these consolidated appeals are from the magistrate judges September 2, 2017 order denying appellants emergency motion for release. This court may lack jurisdiction over these appeals because appeals from orders relating to the release or detention of individuals charged with federal crimes are governed by 28 U.S.C. 1291, which provides that this court shall have jurisdiction over all final decisions of the district courts of the United States. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. The magistrate judges pretrial detention order therefore does not appear to be final for purposes of 1291 because it is subject to review by the district court. See 18 U.S.C. 3145(b); Fed. R. App. P. 9(a). Within 7 days after the date of this order, appellants shall show cause, either in one joint filing or in individual filings, why these consolidated appeals should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction or shall move for voluntary dismissal of these consolidated appeals. If appellants elect to show cause, appellee may file a reply within 3 days after service of any response. If any appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss the relevant appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspending pending further order. If necessary, the court will set a briefing schedule upon resolution of this order to show cause. [10588500] [17-10394, 17-10395, 17-10396, 17-10397, 17-10398, 17-10399, 17-10402, 17-10404] (RT) [Entered: 09/20/2017 05:34 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. Memorandum/Motion re: 9th Circuit Rule 9-1.1(a) due 09/29/2017 for Appellant Ammon E. Bundy. The Response shall be filed within 10 days of service of the 9a Memo/Motion. The Optional Reply may be filed within 7 days of service of the Response. See 9th Cir. R. 9-1.1. Contacted counsel re: Informed of rule & time limits & docket number. [10583358] (HC) [Entered: 09/15/2017 02:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
