Heather Marlowe v. City and County of San Fran, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant,: HEATHER MARLOWE
Defendant - Appellee,: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a governmental entity, SUZY LOFTUS, individually and in her official capacity as President of the San Francisco Police Commission, GREG SUHR, Individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police of the San Francisco Police Department, MIKAIL ALI, individually and in his official capacity of Deputy Chief of the San Francisco Police Department and JOE CORDES, individually and in his official capacity as an office of the San Francisco Police Department
Case Number: 17-15205
Filed: February 3, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 20, 2019 HEATHER MARLOWE V. CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Heather Marlowe v. City and County of San Fran, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant,: HEATHER MARLOWE
Represented By: Alexander Solomon Zalkin
Represented By: William Litvak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a governmental entity
Represented By: Renee Erickson
Represented By: Margaret W. Baumgartner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: SUZY LOFTUS, individually and in her official capacity as President of the San Francisco Police Commission
Represented By: Renee Erickson
Represented By: Margaret W. Baumgartner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: GREG SUHR, Individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police of the San Francisco Police Department
Represented By: Renee Erickson
Represented By: Margaret W. Baumgartner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: MIKAIL ALI, individually and in his official capacity of Deputy Chief of the San Francisco Police Department
Represented By: Renee Erickson
Represented By: Margaret W. Baumgartner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: JOE CORDES, individually and in his official capacity as an office of the San Francisco Police Department
Represented By: Renee Erickson
Represented By: Margaret W. Baumgartner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?