Roderick Mitchell v. Daniel Stone, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant,: RODERICK L. MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee,: DANIEL STONE and ROBERT AMBROSELLI
Case Number: 17-15631
Filed: April 5, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
October 26, 2017 RODERICK MITCHELL V. DANIEL STONE

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Roderick Mitchell v. Daniel Stone, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant,: RODERICK L. MITCHELL
Represented By: Roderick L. Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: DANIEL STONE
Represented By: R. Lawrence Bragg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: ROBERT AMBROSELLI
Represented By: R. Lawrence Bragg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?