Contest Promotions, LLC v. City and County of San Franci

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Contest Promotions, LLC v. City and County of San Franci

Contest Promotions, LLC v. City and County of San Franci

Plaintiff - Appellant,:	CONTEST PROMOTIONS, LLC
Defendant - Appellee,:	CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Case Number:	17-15909
Filed:	May 3, 2017
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed	Description
August 16, 2017	Contest Promotions, LLC v. City and County of San Francisco
October 23, 2017	CONTEST PROMOTIONS, LLC V. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCIS

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 23, 2017	Filing 9029463480 Filed order and amended opinion (SUSAN P. GRABER, MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND and CONSUELO B. MARSHALL). Amending Disposition Opinion AFFIRMED;The opinion filed on August 16, 2017, and published at 867 F.3d 1171, is amended by the opinion filed concurrently with this order, as follows: (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny Appellant s petition for rehearing. Judges Graber and Friedland have voted to deny Appellant s petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Marshall has so recommended. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on it. Appellant s petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc may be filed. [10626874]

Date Filed

Document Text

October 23, 2017

Filing 9029463480 Filed order and amended opinion (SUSAN P. GRABER, MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND and CONSUELO B. MARSHALL). Amending Disposition Opinion AFFIRMED;The opinion filed on August 16, 2017, and published at 867 F.3d 1171, is amended by the opinion filed concurrently with this order, as follows: (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny Appellant s petition for rehearing. Judges Graber and Friedland have voted to deny Appellant s petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Marshall has so recommended. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on it. Appellant s petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc may be filed. [10626874]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Contest Promotions, LLC v. City and County of San Franci
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant,: CONTEST PROMOTIONS, LLC
Represented By:	Michael Floyd Wright
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Represented By:	James Moxon Emery
Represented By:	Thomas S. Lakritz
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?