Roy Warden v. Richard Miranda, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant,: ROY WARDEN
Defendant - Appellee,: RICHARD MIRANDA, individually and in his official capacity as Tucson City Manager, MIKE RANKIN, individually and in his official capacity as Tucson City Attorney, CITY OF TUCSON, PAUL SAYRE, individually and in his official capacity as Lt. of the Tucson City Police Department, LISA JUDGE, individually and in her official capacity as Assistant Tucson City Attorney, FRED GREY, individually and in his official capacity as Director of Tucson Parks and Recreation, RENEE OCHOA, individually and in her official capacity as Southwest District Administrator of Tucson Parks and Recreation, MCCARTHY, individually and in his official capacity as Captain of the Tucson City Police Department, D. LOPEZ, individually and in her official capacity a Lt. of the Tucson City Police Department and TUCSON MAY 1ST COALITION FOR WORKER AND IMMIGRANT RIGHTS
Case Number: 17-16640
Filed: August 16, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 11, 2019 ROY WARDEN V. RICHARD MIRANDA

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Roy Warden v. Richard Miranda, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant,: ROY WARDEN
Represented By: Roy Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: RICHARD MIRANDA, individually and in his official capacity as Tucson City Manager
Represented By: Baird Stephen Greene
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: MIKE RANKIN, individually and in his official capacity as Tucson City Attorney
Represented By: Baird Stephen Greene
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: CITY OF TUCSON
Represented By: Baird Stephen Greene
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: PAUL SAYRE, individually and in his official capacity as Lt. of the Tucson City Police Department
Represented By: Baird Stephen Greene
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: LISA JUDGE, individually and in her official capacity as Assistant Tucson City Attorney
Represented By: Baird Stephen Greene
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: FRED GREY, individually and in his official capacity as Director of Tucson Parks and Recreation
Represented By: Baird Stephen Greene
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: RENEE OCHOA, individually and in her official capacity as Southwest District Administrator of Tucson Parks and Recreation
Represented By: Baird Stephen Greene
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: MCCARTHY, individually and in his official capacity as Captain of the Tucson City Police Department
Represented By: Baird Stephen Greene
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: D. LOPEZ, individually and in her official capacity a Lt. of the Tucson City Police Department
Represented By: Baird Stephen Greene
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: TUCSON MAY 1ST COALITION FOR WORKER AND IMMIGRANT RIGHTS
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?