Ricardo Calderon Lopez, et al v. Office of the Secretary, et al
| STARLIGHT ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES, INC. and STARLIGHT MUSIC MANAGEMENT, INC. |
| OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE and UNKNOWN STATE OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL, Servicing the State Agencies-Franchise Tax Board |
| RICARDO J. CALDERON-LOPEZ |
| 17-16719 |
| August 28, 2017 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 MANDATE ISSUED. (WCC, WAF and CMC) [11052877] (CW) [Entered: 10/19/2018 08:30 AM] |
| Filing 19 Filed order (WILLIAM C. CANBY, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN): Calderon-Lopezs motion to stay the mandate (Docket Entry No. [ # 18 ]) is denied. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. [11043766] (AF) [Entered: 10/11/2018 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 18 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Ricardo J. Calderon-Lopez Motion to stay the mandate. Date of service: 08/01/2018. [10963222] [17-16719] --[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected motion (corrected table of contents). 8/2/2018 by TYL] (Calderon-Lopez, Ricardo) [Entered: 08/01/2018 04:42 PM] |
| Filing 17 Filed order (WILLIAM C. CANBY, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN) On March 9, 2018, the court ordered appellant to explain in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) (court shall dismiss case at any time, if court determines it is frivolous or malicious). Upon a review of the record, the response to the March 9, 2018 order, and the opening brief received on October 14, 2017, we conclude this appeal is frivolous. We therefore deny appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 11 ] ), see 28 U.S.C. 1915(a), and dismiss this appeal as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). All other pending motions and requests are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [10942678] (RT) [Entered: 07/13/2018 06:22 PM] |
| Filing 16 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Ricardo J. Calderon-Lopez Motion for miscellaneous relief [Informative Motion-Response to Court Order [15.] F.R.A.P. 27]. Date of service: 03/16/2018. [10801542] [17-16719] (Calderon-Lopez, Ricardo) [Entered: 03/16/2018 12:53 PM] |
| Filing 15 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LAB): The December 4, 2017 order is vacated as issued in error. A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant does not move to dismiss this appeal, the court may dismiss the appeal as frivolous, without further notice. Any determination of whether the appeal is frivolous will be based on the opening brief received on October 14, 2017, and appellants statement, if any, in response to this order. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. All other pending motions will be addressed by separate order, if necessary, following the resolution of this order to show cause. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, or statement that the appeal should go forward. [10792512] (AF) [Entered: 03/09/2018 11:25 AM] |
| Filing 14 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Ricardo J. Calderon-Lopez response to Court order dated 12/04/2017. Date of service: 12/12/2017. [10687558] [17-16719]--[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 12/12/2017 by SLM] (Calderon-Lopez, Ricardo) [Entered: 12/12/2017 11:32 AM] |
| Filing 13 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LAB): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has denied appellant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant does not move to dismiss this appeal, the court may dismiss the appeal as frivolous, without further notice. Any determination of whether the appeal is frivolous will be based on the opening brief received on October 14, 2017, and appellants statement, if any, in response to this order. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. All other pending motions will be addressed by separate order, if necessary, following the resolution of this order to show cause. [10677361] (AF) [Entered: 12/04/2017 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Ricardo J. Calderon-Lopez Motion for miscellaneous relief [Informative Motion]. Date of service: 11/11/2017. [10650543] [17-16719] (Calderon-Lopez, Ricardo) [Entered: 11/11/2017 04:48 PM] |
| Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Ricardo J. Calderon-Lopez Affidavit Accompanying Motion for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (Form 4). Date of service: 11/02/2017. [10642143] [17-16719] (Calderon-Lopez, Ricardo) [Entered: 11/02/2017 05:02 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MF): The court has received appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The motion, however, is not accompanied by a completed financial affidavit. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall complete a Form 4 financial affidavit. Failure to comply with this order may result in the denial of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [10641147] (CKP) [Entered: 11/02/2017 11:16 AM] |
| Filing 9 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 17-16719: IFP Pending In COA] ), IFP motion filed 9/18/17. [10619753] (LA) [Entered: 10/16/2017 06:17 PM] |
| Filing 8 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Mr. Ricardo J. Calderon-Lopez. Date of service: 10/14/2017. [10618050] [17-16719] (Calderon-Lopez, Ricardo) [Entered: 10/14/2017 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Ricardo J. Calderon-Lopez response to Court order dated 08/28/2017. Date of service: 09/18/2017. [10585205] [17-16719] --[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 9/19/2017 by TYL] (Calderon-Lopez, Ricardo) [Entered: 09/18/2017 03:18 PM] |
| Filing 6 Mail returned on 09/13/2017 addressed to Starlight Music Management, Inc., re: Court order [ # 2 ] filed on 08/28/2017. Returned envelope notes: return to sender, attempted - not known, unable to forward. Resending to: case files; no forwarding address found. [10580320] (LA) [Entered: 09/13/2017 05:19 PM] |
| Filing 5 Mail returned on 09/13/2017 addressed to Starlight Entertainment Enterprises, Inc., re: case opening information [ # 1 ] sent on 08/28/2017. Returned envelope notes: return to sender, attempted - not known, unable to forward. Resending to: case files; no forwarding address found. [10580318] (LA) [Entered: 09/13/2017 05:18 PM] |
| Filing 4 Mail returned on 09/11/2017 addressed to Starlight Entertainment Enterprises, Inc., re: Court order [ # 2 ] filed on 08/28/2017. Returned envelope notes: return to sender, attempted - not known, unable to forward. Resending to: case files; no forwarding address found. [10579847] (LA) [Entered: 09/13/2017 02:33 PM] |
| Filing 3 Mail returned on 09/11/2017 addressed to Starlight Music Management, Inc., re: case opening information [ # 1 ] sent on 08/28/2017. Returned envelope notes: return to sender, attempted - not known, unable to forward. Resending to: case files; no forwarding address found. [10579842] (LA) [Entered: 09/13/2017 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [10561085] (CKP) [Entered: 08/28/2017 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF PRO SE APPELLANTS AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Ricardo Jose Calderon Lopez, Starlight Entertainment Enterprises, Inc. and Starlight Music Management, Inc. opening brief due 10/24/2017. [10560012] (JMR) [Entered: 08/28/2017 09:14 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
