Carmit Bachar, et al v. Lorraine Anderson, et al
| COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ex rel. Carmit Bachar, FRANCISE TAX BOARD, ex rel. Carmit Bachar, LOS ANGELES COUNTY TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR, ex rel. Carmit Bachar, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS OVERSIGHT, ex rel. Carmit Bachar and STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Carmit Bachar |
| CARMIT BACHAR, ex rel. USA |
| LORRAINE ANDERSON, CLEAR RECON CORPORATION, ALDRIDGE PITE, LLC, UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA, N.A., CONSUMER LENDING, LELAND PROPERTIES, R. LEE WALTERS, MARILYN MORDETZKY, RALPH HOFER, ARNETT FAMILY TRUST NO. 5778 and DOES, 1-5 |
| 17-55379 |
| March 22, 2017 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Qui Tam False Claims Act |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MANDATE ISSUED. (EL, MDS and MBC) [10871013] (RL) [Entered: 05/14/2018 10:32 AM] |
| Filing 14 Filed order (EDWARD LEAVY, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and MORGAN B. CHRISTEN) The district court certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has denied appellant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). On June 19, 2017 the court ordered appellant to explain in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) (court shall dismiss case at any time, if court determines it is frivolous or malicious). Upon a review of the record and responses to the courts June 19, 2017 order, we conclude this appeal is frivolous. We therefore deny appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) and dismiss this appeal as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). All other pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [10808582] (JMR) [Entered: 03/22/2018 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 13 Filed (ECF) Appellee Aldridge Pite, LLC reply to response (). Date of service: 08/04/2017. [10534119] [17-55379] (Pomeroy, Timothy) [Entered: 08/04/2017 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 12 COURT DELETED INCORRECT/DUPLICATE ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 13 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellee Aldridge Pite, LLC answer to Miscellaneous petition. Date of service: 08/04/2017. [10534077] [17-55379] (Pomeroy, Timothy) [Entered: 08/04/2017 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 11 Added attorney Timothy R. Pomeroy for Aldridge Pite, LLC, in case 17-55379. [10534033] (RR) [Entered: 08/04/2017 03:10 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Tim Pomeroy for Appellee Aldridge Pite, LLC. Date of service: 08/03/2017. [10533855] [17-55379] (Pomeroy, Timothy) [Entered: 08/04/2017 02:03 PM] |
| Filing 9 COURT DELETED INCORRECT/DUPLICATE ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 10 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Tim Pomeroy for Appellee Aldridge Pite, LLC. Date of service: 08/03/2017. [10532870] [17-55379] (Pomeroy, Timothy) [Entered: 08/03/2017 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellee Union Bank of California, N.A. Motion to take judicial notice. Date of service: 08/03/2017. [10532752] --[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [7] .] (TYL) [Entered: 08/03/2017 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 7 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 8 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellee Union Bank of California, N.A. response supporting motion ([ # 6 ] Response to Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 08/03/2017. [10532526] [17-55379] (Hernandez, Joshua) [Entered: 08/03/2017 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellee Union Bank of California, N.A. response opposing motion ([ # 5 ] Response (P) Response to Order). Date of service: 08/03/2017. [10532402] [17-55379] (Hernandez, Joshua) [Entered: 08/03/2017 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Carmit Bachar statement that appeal should go forward. Served on 07/19/2017. [10519437] (RL) [Entered: 07/24/2017 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KML): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has denied appellant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellee may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [10479891] (OC) [Entered: 06/19/2017 04:53 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 03/28/2017 To proceed In Forma Pauperis denied. [10379374] (JFF) [Entered: 03/31/2017 01:46 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Carmit Bachar motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/15/2017. [10367053] (RT) [Entered: 03/22/2017 11:33 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Carmit Bachar opening brief due 08/28/2017. Appellees Aldridge Pite, LLC, Lorraine Anderson, Arnett Family Trust No. 5778, Clear Recon Corp., Consumer Lending, Does, Ralph Hofer, Leland Properties, Marilyn Mordetzky, Union Bank of California, N.A. and R. Lee Walters answering brief due 09/27/2017. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [10367036] (RT) [Entered: 03/22/2017 11:29 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
