Rachel Cody, et al v. SoulCycle, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellee: RACHEL CODY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Appellant: KERRY ANN SWEENEY
Defendant / Appellee: SOULCYCLE, INC.
Case Number: 17-56608
Filed: October 23, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2018 Filing 5 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: CKP) Motion to dismiss case for failure to prosecute (Cir. Rule 42-1). Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to respond to order. (Order dated 01/08/2018). This order served on the district court shall, 21 days after the date of the order, act as the mandate of this court. [10776919] (CKP) [Entered: 02/26/2018 11:34 AM]
January 8, 2018 Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MF): On November 16, 2017, this court issued an order requiring appellant to pay the $505 docketing and filing fees or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. To date, appellant has failed to comply with the November 16, 2017 order. Appellants December 18, 2017 letter to the court requests a temporary stay of proceedings. The request is denied. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall have one final opportunity to comply with the November 16, 2017 order. If appellant fails to comply, this appeal will be dismissed by the Clerk for failure to prosecute pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. The Clerk shall send a copy of the November 16, 2017 order to appellant along with this order. [10716114] (CKP) [Entered: 01/08/2018 11:10 AM]
December 18, 2017 Filing 3 Filed Appellant Kerry Ann Sweeney letter dated 12/11/2017 re:. no longer receiving electronic notices; requesting immediate stay. [10699182] (HH) [Entered: 12/21/2017 10:44 AM]
November 16, 2017 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [10656797] (CKP) [Entered: 11/16/2017 12:06 PM]
October 23, 2017 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 11/20/2017. Transcript due 12/19/2017. Appellant Kerry Ann Sweeney opening brief due 01/29/2018. Appellees Rachel Cody and SoulCycle, Inc. answering brief due 02/27/2018. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [10627076] (JMR) [Entered: 10/23/2017 09:30 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Rachel Cody, et al v. SoulCycle, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: RACHEL CODY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Represented By: Dorian S. Berger
Represented By: Nicholas R. Diamand
Represented By: Daniel Paul Hipskind
Represented By: Katherine C. Lubin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: KERRY ANN SWEENEY
Represented By: Kerry Ann Sweeney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SOULCYCLE, INC.
Represented By: Grant P. Alexander
Represented By: Keara M. Gordon
Represented By: Shirli Fabbri Weiss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?