James Mooney, et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, et al
| JAMES PAUL MOONEY and LAZY COYOTE RV VILLAGE, LLC, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated |
| UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, successor to SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, SFPP, L.P., formerly known as SANTA FE PACIFIC PIPELINES, Inc., formerly known as SOUTHERN PACIFIC PIPELINES, Inc., KINDER MORGAN OPERATING L.P. "D" and KINDER MORGAN G.P., INC. |
| 17-80078 |
| May 5, 2017 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: James Mooney, et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - petitioner,: JAMES PAUL MOONEY | |
| Represented By: | Norman Siegel |
| Represented By: | Thomas Scott Stewart |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - petitioner,: LAZY COYOTE RV VILLAGE, LLC, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated | |
| Represented By: | Norman Siegel |
| Represented By: | Thomas Scott Stewart |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - respondent,: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, successor to SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | Joe Rebein |
| Represented By: | John K. Sherk |
| Represented By: | Tammy Beth Webb |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - respondent,: SFPP, L.P., formerly known as SANTA FE PACIFIC PIPELINES, Inc., formerly known as SOUTHERN PACIFIC PIPELINES, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | M. Ray Hartman |
| Represented By: | Catherine O'Connor |
| Represented By: | Steven Marc Strauss |
| Represented By: | Summer Jerre Wynn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - respondent,: KINDER MORGAN OPERATING L.P. "D" | |
| Represented By: | M. Ray Hartman |
| Represented By: | Catherine O'Connor |
| Represented By: | Steven Marc Strauss |
| Represented By: | Summer Jerre Wynn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - respondent,: KINDER MORGAN G.P., INC. | |
| Represented By: | M. Ray Hartman |
| Represented By: | Catherine O'Connor |
| Represented By: | Steven Marc Strauss |
| Represented By: | Summer Jerre Wynn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
