Carolynne Harris v. David Mundel
Plaintiff - Appellant,: CAROLYNNE R. HARRIS, as Trustee of the Edith Heinemann Harris Trust (U/A) June 10, 2003), a Washington trust
Defendant - Appellee,: DAVID S. MUNDEL, as Trustee of the August B. Mundel and Joan Webb Mundel Trust (U/A March 27, 1988), a New York Trust
Case Number: 18-35669
Filed: August 14, 2018
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instruments

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 27, 2021 CAROLYNNE HARRIS V. DAVID MUNDEL

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Carolynne Harris v. David Mundel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant,: CAROLYNNE R. HARRIS, as Trustee of the Edith Heinemann Harris Trust (U/A) June 10, 2003), a Washington trust
Represented By: Bradley R. Duncan
Represented By: Joshua Rataezyk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee,: DAVID S. MUNDEL, as Trustee of the August B. Mundel and Joan Webb Mundel Trust (U/A March 27, 1988), a New York Trust
Represented By: Anthony S. Wisen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?