Randall Pittman, et al v. Digital Intelligence Systems,, et al
| JUDY CALHOUN and J. ROBERT BERRELLEZ, on behalf of themselves, and all others similarly situated |
| RANDALL PITTMAN |
| DIGITAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, LLC, a Virginia limited liability corporation, BANK OF AMERICA, NA, PONTOON SOLUTIONS, INC. and ROSE INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Missouri corporation |
| 18-55207 |
| February 16, 2018 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Labor Litigation |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: CKP) Motion to dismiss case for failure to prosecute (Cir. Rule 42-1). Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to pay fees. This order served on the district court shall, 21 days after the date of the order, act as the mandate of this court. [10833241] (CKP) [Entered: 04/11/2018 03:28 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [10787441] (CKP) [Entered: 03/06/2018 10:41 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 03/14/2018. Transcript due 04/13/2018. Appellant Randall Pittman opening brief due 05/23/2018. Appellees Bank of America, N.A., J. Robert Berrellez, Judy Calhoun, Digital Intelligence Systems, LLC, Pontoon Solutions, Inc. and Rose International, Inc. answering brief due 06/25/2018. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [10766708] (RT) [Entered: 02/16/2018 09:21 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
