Doyma Michel v. CBP, et al
DOYMA VANESSA MICHEL |
UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, a federal government agency and SAFARILAND, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
18-55211 |
February 16, 2018 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other Personal Injury |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Doyma Michel v. CBP, et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant,: DOYMA VANESSA MICHEL | |
Represented By: | Eugene G. Iredale |
Represented By: | Julia Yoo |
Represented By: | Grace Jun |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee,: UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, a federal government agency | |
Represented By: | Steve B. Chu |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee,: SAFARILAND, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company | |
Represented By: | Steven Douglas Smelser |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.