Bettina Lorton v. San Bernardino Superior Court, et al
BETTINA LORTON |
THE SUPERIOR COURT SYSTEMS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, NANCY EBERHARDT, Court Executive Officer and Clerk-in-Chief, DENISE NELSON, official capacity, JENNIFER MEDINA, official capacity, REGINA ESTRADA, individual, official capacity and MARIBEL SERNA, individual, official capacity |
18-55898 |
July 6, 2018 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MANDATE ISSUED. (DFO, MSB and SSI) [11082942] (QDL) [Entered: 11/09/2018 09:14 AM] |
Filing 6 Filed order (DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, MARSHA S. BERZON and SANDRA S. IKUTA): On August 24, 2018, the court dismissed this appeal for failure to prosecute because appellant had not paid the filing and docketing fees. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. Appellant has now filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) is treated in part as a motion to reinstate this appeal and is granted. The August 24, 2018 order is vacated, and the appeal is reinstated. A review of the record indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district courts judgment. AFFIRMED. [11051953] (AF) [Entered: 10/18/2018 01:24 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed Appellant Bettina Lorton affidavit of prior submission of IFP with slightly incorrect case no. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11017033] (QDL) [Entered: 09/19/2018 10:09 AM] |
Filing 4 Filed Appellant Bettina Lorton motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis, to complete production of Reporters Transcript at government expense. Deficiencies: Case closed. Served on 09/13/2018. [11017022] (QDL) [Entered: 09/19/2018 10:06 AM] |
Filing 3 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: CKP) Motion to dismiss case for failure to prosecute (Cir. Rule 42-1). Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to pay fees. This order served on the district court shall, 21 days after the date of the order, act as the mandate of this court. [10989522] (CKP) [Entered: 08/24/2018 04:05 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [10933509] (CKP) [Entered: 07/06/2018 12:31 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Bettina Lorton opening brief due 08/31/2018. [10933062] (JBS) [Entered: 07/06/2018 09:06 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.