USA v. Leonard Walter
Defendant / Appellant: LEONARD WALTER
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 19-10048
Filed: February 13, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2019 Filing 7 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: DV) Appellants motion for voluntary dismissal of this appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 6 ]) is granted. This appeal is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b); 9th Cir. R. 27-9.1. This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court. [11226236] (OC) [Entered: 03/13/2019 01:52 PM]
March 13, 2019 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Leonard Walter Unopposed Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 03/13/2019. [11225804] [19-10048] (Balazs, John) [Entered: 03/13/2019 10:47 AM]
February 20, 2019 Filing 5 Criminal Justice Act electronic voucher created. (Counsel: Mr. John Paul Balazs for Leonard Walter) [11201516] (BJK) [Entered: 02/20/2019 02:50 PM]
February 20, 2019 Filing 4 Attorney Kelly Babineau in 19-10048 substituted by Attorney John Paul Balazs in 19-10048 [11200573] (OC) [Entered: 02/20/2019 09:36 AM]
February 20, 2019 Filing 3 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): The motion of appellants appointed counsel, Kelly Babineau, Esq., to be relieved as counsel of record and for appointment of new counsel (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) is granted. John P. Balazs, Esq., 916 Second Street, Suite F, Sacramento, California 95814, (916) 447-9299, is appointed as appellants appointed counsel of record for this appeal. The Clerk shall amend the courts docket to reflect counsel Balazs appointed status and address. The previously established briefing schedule remains in effect. The Clerk shall serve this order on counsel Balazs. Within 21 days after the date of this order, counsel Balazs shall serve this order on appellant individually and provide this court with proof of such service showing appellants registration number and current address. The Clerk shall also serve this order on former counsel. (AppComm Direct Criminal) [11200570] (OC) [Entered: 02/20/2019 09:34 AM]
February 14, 2019 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Leonard Walter Motion for appointment of counsel. Date of service: 02/14/2019. [11190452] [19-10048] (Babineau, Kelly) [Entered: 02/14/2019 12:17 PM]
February 13, 2019 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. Reporters Transcript required: Yes. Sentence imposed: 120 Months. Transcript ordered by 02/26/2019. Transcript due 03/28/2019. Appellant briefs and excerpts due by 05/07/2019 for Leonard Walter. Appellee brief due 06/06/2019 for United States of America. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11188969] (JPD) [Entered: 02/13/2019 01:16 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Leonard Walter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: LEONARD WALTER
Represented By: John Paul Balazs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Jason Hitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?