USA v. Steven Zinnel
Defendant / Appellant: STEVEN ZINNEL
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 19-10159
Filed: May 9, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 22, 2021 USA V. STEVEN ZINNEL

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 26, 2019 Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Appellee USA response to Court order dated 06/03/2019. Date of service: 06/26/2019. [11345728] [19-10159] (Segal, Matthew) [Entered: 06/26/2019 03:08 PM]
June 26, 2019 Filing 11 Received notice of change of address dated 06/29/2019 from appellant Steven Zinnel. New address: c/o Tahsa Paris Chalfant, 5701 Lonetree Blvd., Suite 312, Rocklin, CA 95765. (party has counsel) [11345629] --[Edited: Updated Address. 06/26/2019 by TYL] (RL) [Entered: 06/26/2019 02:38 PM]
June 25, 2019 Filing 10 Criminal Justice Act electronic voucher created. (Counsel: Mr. Michael Tanaka for Steven Zinnel) [11343378] (DO) [Entered: 06/25/2019 10:01 AM]
June 11, 2019 Filing 9 Received email notice of CJA counsel of record appointment. Attorney Michael Tanaka for party Appellant Steven Zinnel, in case 19-10159. [11326779] (DJV) [Entered: 06/11/2019 12:20 PM]
June 5, 2019 Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellee USA response to Court order dated 06/03/2019. Date of service: 06/05/2019. [11321261] [19-10159] (Segal, Matthew) [Entered: 06/05/2019 04:49 PM]
June 3, 2019 Filing 7 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): Appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]) is granted. The Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect this status. Appellants motion for appointment of counsel (Docket Entry No. [ # 6 ]) is granted. Counsel will be appointed by separate order. The Clerk shall electronically serve this order on the appointing authority for the Eastern District of California, who will locate appointed counsel. The appointing authority shall send notification of the name, address, and telephone number of appointed counsel to the Clerk of this court at counselappointments@ca9.uscourts.gov within 14 days of locating counsel. Counsel shall designate the reporters transcript by July 1, 2019. The transcript is due July 31, 2019. The opening brief and excerpts of record are due September 9, 2019; the answering brief is due October 9, 2019; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Appellants motion for appointment of hybrid counsel, contained within the notice of appeal, (Docket Entry Nos. [ # 2 ] & 3) is denied. Appellant is informed that this court does not appoint hybrid or standby counsel. Appellants Registration Number is: 66138-097, and his housing status is not in BOP custody. Within 14 days after the date of this order, Assistant United States Attorney Matthew D. Segal shall serve this order on appellant and provide this court with proof of service, including appellants current address. (AppComm Direct Criminal) [11317910] (OC) [Entered: 06/03/2019 03:55 PM]
May 16, 2019 Filing 6 Filed Appellant Steven Zinnel supplement to motion for appointment of counsel, notice of consent to withdrawal of counsel. Dated 05/13/2019. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11301948] (RL) [Entered: 05/17/2019 04:26 PM]
May 16, 2019 Filing 5 Filed Appellant Steven Zinnel supplement to motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Dated 05/13/2019. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11301944] (RL) [Entered: 05/17/2019 04:25 PM]
May 16, 2019 Filing 4 Received notice of change of address dated 05/13/2019 from Steven Zinnel. New address: c/o Tasha Paris Chalfant, attorney, 5701 Lonetree Blvd., Suite 312, Rocklin, CA 95765 . [11301927] --[Edited: Updated Address. 05/17/2019 by TYL] (RL) [Entered: 05/17/2019 04:20 PM]
May 9, 2019 Filing 3 Filed Appellant Steven Zinnel motion to appoint hybrid counsel on appeal (within notice of appeal). Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/06/2019. [11291820] (HC) [Entered: 05/09/2019 10:03 AM]
May 9, 2019 Filing 2 Filed Appellant Steven Zinnel motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/06/2019. [11291818] (HC) [Entered: 05/09/2019 10:02 AM]
May 9, 2019 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. Reporters Transcript required: Yes. Sentence imposed: 152 Months. Transcript ordered by 05/28/2019. Transcript due 06/26/2019. Appellant briefs and excerpts due by 08/05/2019 for Steven Zinnel. Appellee brief due 09/04/2019 for United States of America. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11291806] (HC) [Entered: 05/09/2019 09:57 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Steven Zinnel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: STEVEN ZINNEL
Represented By: Steven Zinnel
Represented By: Michael Tanaka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Matthew D. Segal
Represented By: Kevin Christopher Khasigian
Represented By: Kurt Didier
Represented By: Audrey Benison Hemesath
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?