Adrian Chaparro v. Nnenna Ikegbu, et al
Defendant / Appellee: MAUREEN MCLEAN, J. LEWIS, D. JACOBSON and NNENNA IKEGBU
Plaintiff / Appellant: ADRIAN ARMANDO CHAPARRO
Case Number: 19-15012
Filed: January 3, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 16, 2019 ADRIAN CHAPARRO V. NNENNA IKEGBU

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2019 Filing 4 Streamlined request by Appellant Adrian Armando Chaparro to extend time to file the brief is not approved because this appeal was closed on 03/05/2019 for failure to respond to order. [11217504] (JN) [Entered: 03/06/2019 08:19 AM]
March 5, 2019 Filing 3 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: CKP) Motion to dismiss case for failure to prosecute (Cir. Rule 42-1). Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to respond to order. (Order dated 01/30/2019). This order served on the district court shall, 21 days after the date of the order, act as the mandate of this court. [11216453] (CKP) [Entered: 03/05/2019 12:04 PM]
January 30, 2019 Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [11172651] (CKP) [Entered: 01/30/2019 10:59 AM]
January 3, 2019 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Adrian Armando Chaparro opening brief due 03/01/2019. Appellees Nnenna Ikegbu, D. Jacobson, J. Lewis and Maureen McLean answering brief due 04/01/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11140107] (JMR) [Entered: 01/03/2019 11:22 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Adrian Chaparro v. Nnenna Ikegbu, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MAUREEN MCLEAN
Represented By: Robert Wayne Henkels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: J. LEWIS
Represented By: Robert Wayne Henkels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: D. JACOBSON
Represented By: Robert Wayne Henkels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NNENNA IKEGBU
Represented By: Robert Wayne Henkels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ADRIAN ARMANDO CHAPARRO
Represented By: Adrian Armando Chaparro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?