Wayne Steven Anderson v. John Marsh
| JOHN MARSH, California Highway Patrol Officer |
| ESTATE OF WAYNE STEVEN ANDERSON |
| 19-15068 |
| January 11, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant further settlement discussions. [11190690] (BS) [Entered: 02/14/2019 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 10 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 02/13/2019, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11171575] (BS) [Entered: 01/29/2019 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 9 Added attorney Kymberly E. Speer for John Marsh, in case 19-15068. [11164585] (QDL) [Entered: 01/24/2019 09:20 AM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Kymberly E. Speer for Appellant John Marsh. Date of service: 01/24/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11164580] [19-15068] (Speer, Kymberly) [Entered: 01/24/2019 09:18 AM] |
| Filing 7 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 01/22/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11161361] (AD) [Entered: 01/22/2019 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellee Estate of Wayne Steven Anderson Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 01/22/2019. [11160675] [19-15068] (Carlson, Adam) [Entered: 01/22/2019 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 5 Added attorney Adam Carlson for Estate of Wayne Steven Anderson, in case 19-15068. [11158978] (QDL) [Entered: 01/18/2019 11:39 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Adam Michael Carlson for Appellee Estate of Wayne Steven Anderson. Date of service: 01/18/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11158949] [19-15068] (Carlson, Adam) [Entered: 01/18/2019 11:29 AM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 01/16/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11155448] (AD) [Entered: 01/16/2019 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant John Marsh Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 01/16/2019. [11155154] [19-15068] (Fong, Wilfred) [Entered: 01/16/2019 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 01/18/2019. Transcript ordered by 02/11/2019. Transcript due 03/12/2019. Appellant John Marsh opening brief due 04/22/2019. Appellee Estate of Wayne Steven Anderson answering brief due 05/21/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11150368] (JBS) [Entered: 01/11/2019 01:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
