USA v. Albert Hee
| ALBERT S.N. HEE |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-15170 |
| January 30, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Albert S.N. Hee motion for certificate of appealability. Deficiencies: None. Served on 02/19/2019. [11206659] (QDL) [Entered: 02/25/2019 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 5 Added attorney Marion Percell for USA, in case 19-15170. [11205060] (QDL) [Entered: 02/22/2019 03:43 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Marion Percell for Appellee USA. Date of service: 02/22/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11205049] [19-15170] (Percell, Marion) [Entered: 02/22/2019 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 02/06/2019 denying request for certificate of appealability. [11182724] (QDL) [Entered: 02/07/2019 01:27 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): The district court has not issued or declined to issue a certificate of appealability in this appeal, which appears to arise under 28 U.S.C. 2255. Accordingly, this case is remanded to the district court for the limited purpose of granting or denying a certificate of appealability at the courts earliest convenience. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); United States v. Asrar, 116 F.3d 1268, 1270 (9th Cir. 1997). If the district court issues a certificate of appealability, the court should specify which issue or issues meet the required showing. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(3); Asrar, 116 F.3d at 1270. Under Asrar, if the district court declines to issue a certificate, the court should state its reasons why a certificate of appealability should not be granted, and the Clerk of the district court shall forward to this court the record with the order denying the certificate. See Asrar, 116 F.3d at 1270. The Clerk shall send a copy of this order to the district court. (Pro Se) [11180792] (CKP) [Entered: 02/06/2019 10:37 AM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket. No COA order in district court. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11173111] (HC) [Entered: 01/30/2019 01:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Albert Hee | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: ALBERT S.N. HEE | |
| Represented By: | Albert S.N. Hee |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Lawrence Tong |
| Represented By: | Marion Percell Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
