In re: Van Flury, et al v. Jade Real Estate Investors LLC, et al
Appellant: ROSAURA N. FLURY and VAN EDWARD FLURY
Appellee: JADE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, LLC and MARK A. TUCKER, PC, an Arizona professional corporation
Debtor: In the Matter of: VAN EDWARD FLURY
Case Number: 19-15200
Filed: February 5, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2019 Filing 4 Filed Appellants Rosaura N. Flury and Van Edward Flury motion to reconsider Panel order of the Court filed on 02/28/2019. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/13/2019. [11233011] (CW) [Entered: 03/19/2019 07:25 AM]
February 28, 2019 Filing 3 Filed order (WILLIAM C. CANBY, SUSAN P. GRABER and M. MARGARET MCKEOWN): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See In re Ryther, 799 F.2d 1412, 1414-15 (9th Cir. 1986) (district courts order denying permission to appeal interlocutory bankruptcy order is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11211857] (AF) [Entered: 02/28/2019 03:18 PM]
February 27, 2019 Filing 2 Filed Appellant Rosaura N. Flury motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 02/22/2019. [11209408] (CW) [Entered: 02/27/2019 11:00 AM]
February 5, 2019 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANTS. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Rosaura N. Flury and Van Edward Flury opening brief due 04/05/2019. Appellees Jade Real Estate Investors, LLC and Mark A. Tucker, PC answering brief due 05/06/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11179143] (HC) [Entered: 02/05/2019 09:30 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Van Flury, et al v. Jade Real Estate Investors LLC, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: ROSAURA N. FLURY
Represented By: Rosaura N. Flury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: VAN EDWARD FLURY
Represented By: Van Edward Flury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: JADE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, LLC
Represented By: Mark A. Tucker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: MARK A. TUCKER, PC, an Arizona professional corporation
Represented By: Mark A. Tucker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Debtor: In the Matter of: VAN EDWARD FLURY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?