Hmong 2, et al v. USA, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: HMONG 3, HMONG 2, HMONG 5 and HMONG 4
Defendant / Appellee: CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 19-15226
Filed: February 8, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 30, 2020 HMONG 2 V. USA

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2019 Filing 8 Streamlined request [7] by Appellants Hmong 2, Hmong 3, Hmong 4 and Hmong 5 to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants Hmong 2, Hmong 3, Hmong 4 and Hmong 5 opening brief due 05/08/2019. Appellees Central Intelligence Agency and United States of America answering brief due 06/07/2019. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [11254067] (BG) [Entered: 04/05/2019 09:42 AM]
April 5, 2019 Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants Hmong 2, Hmong 3, Hmong 4 and Hmong 5. New requested due date is 05/06/2019. [11254035] [19-15226] (Franck, Herman) [Entered: 04/05/2019 09:24 AM]
March 20, 2019 Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant further settlement discussions. [11236272] (VS) [Entered: 03/20/2019 03:06 PM]
March 11, 2019 Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 03/19/2019, 3:00 p.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11223291] (BS) [Entered: 03/11/2019 03:20 PM]
February 26, 2019 Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 02/26/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11208906] (AD) [Entered: 02/26/2019 06:44 PM]
February 26, 2019 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants Hmong 2, Hmong 3, Hmong 4 and Hmong 5 Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 02/26/2019. [11208570] [19-15226] (Franck, Herman) [Entered: 02/26/2019 03:36 PM]
February 19, 2019 Filing 2 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellants have filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellants shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal pursuant to Ninth Cir. R. 42-1. [11198770] (LW) [Entered: 02/19/2019 10:17 AM]
February 8, 2019 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 02/15/2019. Appellants Hmong 2, Hmong 3, Hmong 4 and Hmong 5 opening brief due 04/08/2019. Appellees Central Intelligence Agency and United States of America answering brief due 05/07/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11183590] (JBS) [Entered: 02/08/2019 09:07 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Hmong 2, et al v. USA, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: HMONG 3
Represented By: Herman Franck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: HMONG 2
Represented By: Herman Franck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: HMONG 5
Represented By: Herman Franck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: HMONG 4
Represented By: Herman Franck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Represented By: Joseph Frueh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Joseph Frueh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?