Michael Ford, et al v. [24]7.AI, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant: RUDOLPH DUBROVSZKY, MADISON COPELAND, MICHAEL FORD and NOE GAMBOA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: [24]7.AI, INC.
Case Number: 19-15462
Filed: March 14, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 18, 2020 MICHAEL FORD V. [24]7.AI, INC.
July 16, 2020 MICHAEL FORD V. [24]7.AI, INC.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2020 Filing 45 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: RL): Bill of Cost denied as untimely. [11788121] (RL) [Entered: 08/13/2020 02:02 PM]
August 13, 2020 Filing 44 Filed (ECF) Appellants Madison Copeland, Rudolph Dubrovszky, Michael Ford and Noe Gamboa bill of costs (Form 10) in the amount of $80.20 USD. Date of service: 08/13/2020 [11788049] [19-15462] (Yanchunis, John) [Entered: 08/13/2020 01:47 PM]
August 7, 2020 Filing 43 MANDATE ISSUED.(RAP, BSB and JZ) [11780740] (QDL) [Entered: 08/07/2020 08:37 AM]
July 16, 2020 Filing 42 FILED MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION (RICHARD A. PAEZ, BRIDGET S. BADE and JACK ZOUHARY) Plaintiffs-Appellants shall recover their costs on appeal. VACATED AND REMANDED. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [11754967] (MM) [Entered: 07/16/2020 10:33 AM]
July 16, 2020 Filing 41 Filed text clerk order (Deputy Clerk: WL): Appellee's motion to take judicial notice (Docket Entry # [ # 18 ]) is denied as moot. [11754947] (WL) [Entered: 07/16/2020 10:27 AM]
July 10, 2020 Filing 40 Filed Audio recording of oral argument. Note: Video recordings of public argument calendars are available on the Court's website, at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/ [11748564] (BG) [Entered: 07/10/2020 10:56 AM]
July 9, 2020 Filing 39 ARGUED AND SUBMITTED TO RICHARD A. PAEZ, BRIDGET S. BADE and JACK ZOUHARY. [11747256] (BG) [Entered: 07/09/2020 11:20 AM]
May 27, 2020 Filing 38 Notice of Oral Argument on Thursday, July 9, 2020 - 08:30 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Previously Scheduled Location: Pasadena CA. View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case # here . NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, any argument will be held remotely with all of the judges and attorneys appearing by video or telephone. Your travel to a courthouse will not be required. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument, the Clerk's Office will be in contact with your directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Be sure to review the # GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing, including when to be available (30 minutes before the hearing time) and when and how to submit additional citations (filing electronically as far in advance of the hearing as possible). If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the # ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in CM/ECF no later than 21 days before Thursday, July 9, 2020. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice.[11702290]. [19-15462] (AW) [Entered: 05/27/2020 11:09 AM]
May 13, 2020 Filing 37 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Ryan J. McGee for Appellants Madison Copeland, Rudolph Dubrovszky, Michael Ford and Noe Gamboa. Hearing in Pasadena on 07/09/2020 at 09:00 A.M. (Courtroom: Courtroom 1). Filer sharing argument time: No. Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 05/13/2020. [11689097] [19-15462] (McGee, Ryan) [Entered: 05/13/2020 08:23 AM]
May 12, 2020 Filing 36 Added Attorney(s) Ryan J. McGee for party(s) Appellant Noe Gamboa Appellant Madison Copeland Appellant Rudolph Dubrovszky Appellant Michael Ford. [11688119] (RL) [Entered: 05/12/2020 11:41 AM]
May 12, 2020 Filing 35 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Ryan J. McGee (Morgan and Morgan Complex Litigation Group, 201 N. Franklin Street, 7th Floor, Tampa, FL 33602) for Appellants Madison Copeland, Rudolph Dubrovszky, Michael Ford and Noe Gamboa. Date of service: 05/12/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11688112] [19-15462] (McGee, Ryan) [Entered: 05/12/2020 11:39 AM]
April 29, 2020 Filing 34 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Casie D. Collignon for Appellee [24]7.AI, Inc.. Hearing in Pasadena on 07/09/2020 at 09:00 A.M. (Courtroom: Courtroom 1). Filer sharing argument time: No. Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 04/29/2020. [11675146] [19-15462] (Collignon, Casie) [Entered: 04/29/2020 08:16 AM]
April 26, 2020 Filing 33 Notice of Oral Argument on Thursday, July 9, 2020 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Previously Scheduled Location: Pasadena CA. View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case # here . NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, any argument will be held remotely with all of the judges and attorneys appearing by video or telephone. Your travel to a courthouse will not be required. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument, the Clerk's Office will be in contact with your directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Be sure to review the # GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing, including when to be available (30 minutes before the hearing time) and when and how to submit additional citations (filing electronically as far in advance of the hearing as possible). If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the # ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in CM/ECF no later than 21 days before Thursday, July 9, 2020. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice.[11671721]. [19-15462] (AW) [Entered: 04/26/2020 06:10 AM]
March 11, 2020 Filing 32 Filed (ECF) Attorney Mr. John A. Yanchunis for Appellants Madison Copeland, Rudolph Dubrovszky, Michael Ford and Noe Gamboa response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 03/11/2020. [11626213] [19-15462] (Yanchunis, John) [Entered: 03/11/2020 12:02 PM]
March 11, 2020 Filing 31 Filed (ECF) Attorney Casie D. Collignon for Appellee [24]7.AI, Inc. response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 03/11/2020. [11625769] [19-15462] (Collignon, Casie) [Entered: 03/11/2020 08:53 AM]
March 10, 2020 Filing 30 This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for July 2020 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions . If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please file # Form 32 within 3 business days of this notice using the CM/ECF filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument . Please follow the form's # instructions carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter within 3 business days of this notice , using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : Correspondence to Court; Subject : request for mediation).[11625507]. [19-15462] (AW) [Entered: 03/10/2020 05:51 PM]
February 7, 2020 Filing 29 Filed (ECF) Attorney Casie D. Collignon for Appellee [24]7.AI, Inc. response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 02/07/2020. [11589437] [19-15462] (Collignon, Casie) [Entered: 02/07/2020 10:44 AM]
February 6, 2020 Filing 28 This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for June 2020 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions . If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please file # Form 32 within 3 business days of this notice using the CM/ECF filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument . Please follow the form's # instructions carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter within 3 business days of this notice , using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : Correspondence to Court; Subject : request for mediation).[11588297]. [19-15462] (AW) [Entered: 02/06/2020 02:21 PM]
October 4, 2019 Filing 27 Received 6 paper copies of Reply Brief [ # 25 ] filed by Appellants. [11454338] (SD) [Entered: 10/04/2019 11:12 AM]
October 2, 2019 Filing 26 Filed clerk order: The reply brief [ # 25 ] submitted by appellants is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: gray. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [11452021] (SML) [Entered: 10/02/2019 03:36 PM]
October 2, 2019 Filing 25 Submitted (ECF) Reply Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Madison Copeland, Rudolph Dubrovszky, Michael Ford and Noe Gamboa. Date of service: 10/02/2019. [11452002]--[COURT ENTERED FILING to replace [24].] (SML) [Entered: 10/02/2019 03:34 PM]
October 2, 2019 Filing 24 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 25 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellants Madison Copeland, Rudolph Dubrovszky, Michael Ford and Noe Gamboa reply to response (). Date of service: 10/02/2019. [11451804] [19-15462] (Yanchunis, John) [Entered: 10/02/2019 02:34 PM]
September 19, 2019 Filing 23 Filed 3 paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 14 ] in 1 volume(s) filed by Appellants. [11437782] (SML) [Entered: 09/19/2019 03:36 PM]
September 19, 2019 Filing 22 Received 6 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 13 ] filed by Madison Copeland, Rudolph Dubrovszky, Michael Ford and Noe Gamboa. [11437560] (SD) [Entered: 09/19/2019 02:19 PM]
September 13, 2019 Filing 21 Received 3 paper copies of supplemental excerpts of record [ # 17 ] in 1 volume(s) filed by Appellee [24]7.AI, Inc.. [11431511] (SML) [Entered: 09/13/2019 03:25 PM]
September 13, 2019 Filing 20 ENTRY UPDATED. Received 6 paper copies of Answering Brief [ # 16 ] filed by [24]7.AI, Inc. [11431112]--[Edited 09/16/2019 by LA to correct # of copies] (RG) [Entered: 09/13/2019 01:08 PM]
September 11, 2019 Filing 19 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 16 ] submitted by Appellee [24]7.AI, Inc. is filed. The supplemental excerpts of record [ # 17 ] submitted by Appellee [24]7.AI, Inc. are filed. The Court previously filed the opening brief [ # 13 ] and excerpts of record [ # 14 ] submitted by Appellants. Within 7 days of this order, the filer of each brief is ordered to file 6 copies of that brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. The Form 18 certificate is available on the Court's website at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form18.pdf . The covers of the opening brief must be blue. The covers of the answering brief must be red. Within 7 days of this order, the filer of each set of excerpts of record is ordered to file 3 copies of that set of excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. The address for regular U.S. mail is P.O. Box 193939, San Francisco, CA 94119-3939. The address for overnight mail is 95 Seventh Street, San Francisco, CA 94103-1526. [11428896] (LA) [Entered: 09/11/2019 04:44 PM]
September 11, 2019 Filing 18 Filed (ECF) Appellee [24]7.AI, Inc. Motion to take judicial notice of Exhibits A (Motion for Transfer and Consolidation) and B (Order dismissing Pica action). Date of service: 09/11/2019. [11428264] [19-15462] (Collignon, Casie) [Entered: 09/11/2019 12:18 PM]
September 11, 2019 Filing 17 Submitted (ECF) supplemental excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellee [24]7.AI, Inc.. Date of service: 09/11/2019. [11428245] [19-15462]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached combined PDF file of the excerpts. 09/11/2019 by SML] (Collignon, Casie) [Entered: 09/11/2019 12:05 PM]
September 11, 2019 Filing 16 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Appellee [24]7.AI, Inc.. Date of service: 09/11/2019. [11428224] [19-15462] (Collignon, Casie) [Entered: 09/11/2019 11:52 AM]
August 15, 2019 Filing 15 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 13 ] and excerpts of record [ # 14 ] submitted by Madison Copeland, Rudolph Dubrovszky, Michael Ford and Noe Gamboa are filed. No paper copies are required at this time. [11397943] (KWG) [Entered: 08/15/2019 08:42 AM]
August 12, 2019 Filing 14 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellants Madison Copeland, Rudolph Dubrovszky, Michael Ford and Noe Gamboa. Date of service: 08/12/2019. [11394665] [19-15462] (Yanchunis, John) [Entered: 08/12/2019 03:01 PM]
August 12, 2019 Filing 13 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Michael Ford, Rudolph Dubrovszky, Madison Copeland and Noe Gamboa. Date of service: 08/12/2019. [11394642] [19-15462] (Yanchunis, John) [Entered: 08/12/2019 02:52 PM]
July 26, 2019 Filing 12 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant further settlement discussions. [11378069] (BLS) [Entered: 07/26/2019 12:53 PM]
July 11, 2019 Filing 11 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 07/25/2019, 1:30 p.m. Pacific Time. See order for details. [11361277] (BLS) [Entered: 07/11/2019 05:19 PM]
July 10, 2019 Filing 10 Filed order MEDIATION (SMC): A dial-in telephonic conference will be held on July 11, 2019, at 2:00 p.m. Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email with dial-in information. Please notify the Mediation Office at mediation@ca9.uscourts.gov if counsel does not receive an email or if additional participants should be added. The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows: appellants shall file an opening brief on or before August 12, 2019; appellee shall file an answering brief on or before September 11, 2019; appellants may file an optional reply brief within twenty one (21) days from the service date of the answering brief. [11359044] (OC) [Entered: 07/10/2019 09:35 AM]
June 19, 2019 Filing 9 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 07/09/2019, 2:00 p.m. Pacific Time. (originally scheduled on 06/26/2019 ). [11337001] (BLS) [Entered: 06/19/2019 10:50 AM]
June 12, 2019 Filing 8 Filed order MEDIATION (SMC): A dial-in telephonic conference will be held on June 26, 2019, at 10:30 a.m. Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email with dial-in information. Please notify the Mediation Office at mediation@ca9.uscourts.gov if counsel does not receive an email or if additional participants should be added. The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows: appellants shall file an opening brief on or before July 12, 2019; appellee shall file an answering brief on or before August 12, 2019; appellants may file an optional reply brief within twenty one (21) days from the service date of the answering brief. [11328932] (OC) [Entered: 06/12/2019 03:05 PM]
May 9, 2019 Filing 7 Streamlined request [6] by Appellants Madison Copeland, Rudolph Dubrovszky, Michael Ford and Noe Gamboa to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants Madison Copeland, Rudolph Dubrovszky, Michael Ford and Noe Gamboa opening brief due 06/12/2019. Appellee [24]7.AI, Inc. answering brief due 07/12/2019. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [11292599] (Witt, Dusty) [Entered: 05/09/2019 03:34 PM]
May 9, 2019 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants Madison Copeland, Rudolph Dubrovszky, Michael Ford and Noe Gamboa. New requested due date is 06/12/2019. [11292192] [19-15462] (Weiner, Melissa) [Entered: 05/09/2019 12:59 PM]
April 16, 2019 Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant further settlement discussions. [11265798] (VS) [Entered: 04/16/2019 01:49 PM]
March 25, 2019 Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 04/16/2019, 1:00 p.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11240321] (VS) [Entered: 03/25/2019 09:03 AM]
March 21, 2019 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/21/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11237515] (AD) [Entered: 03/21/2019 12:44 PM]
March 21, 2019 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Madison Copeland, Rudolph Dubrovszky, Michael Ford and Noe Gamboa Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/21/2019. [11237197] [19-15462] (Yanchunis, John) [Entered: 03/21/2019 10:48 AM]
March 14, 2019 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/21/2019. Appellants Madison Copeland, Rudolph Dubrovszky, Michael Ford and Noe Gamboa opening brief due 05/13/2019. Appellee [24]7.AI, Inc. answering brief due 06/13/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11228071] (RT) [Entered: 03/14/2019 02:04 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Michael Ford, et al v. [24]7.AI, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: RUDOLPH DUBROVSZKY
Represented By: Daniel Leon Warshaw Esquire
Represented By: John A. Yanchunis
Represented By: Melissa S. Weiner
Represented By: Clayeo Arnold Esquire
Represented By: Joseph C. Bourne
Represented By: Joshua H. Watson
Represented By: Ryan J. McGee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MADISON COPELAND
Represented By: Daniel Leon Warshaw Esquire
Represented By: John A. Yanchunis
Represented By: Melissa S. Weiner
Represented By: Clayeo Arnold Esquire
Represented By: Joseph C. Bourne
Represented By: Joshua H. Watson
Represented By: Ryan J. McGee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MICHAEL FORD
Represented By: Daniel Leon Warshaw Esquire
Represented By: John A. Yanchunis
Represented By: Melissa S. Weiner
Represented By: Clayeo Arnold Esquire
Represented By: Joseph C. Bourne
Represented By: Joshua H. Watson
Represented By: Ryan J. McGee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: NOE GAMBOA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Represented By: Daniel Leon Warshaw Esquire
Represented By: John A. Yanchunis
Represented By: Melissa S. Weiner
Represented By: Clayeo Arnold Esquire
Represented By: Joseph C. Bourne
Represented By: Joshua H. Watson
Represented By: Ryan J. McGee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: [24]7.AI, INC.
Represented By: Teresa Carey Chow Esquire
Represented By: Paul G. Karlsgodt
Represented By: Casie D. Collignon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?