Carneice Hall-Johnson v. City and County of San Francis, et al
| CARNEICE KATHRINE HALL-JOHNSON |
| CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and MICKI CALLAHAN |
| 19-15508 |
| March 20, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| CARNEICE HALL-JOHNSON V. CITY & COUNTY OF S.F. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellant Ms. Carneice Kathrine Hall-Johnson response to Court order dated 04/04/2019. Date of service: 05/18/2019. [11302093] [19-15508] (Hall-Johnson, Carneice) [Entered: 05/18/2019 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [11252852] (CKP) [Entered: 04/04/2019 10:46 AM] |
| Filing 6 Received copy of District Court order filed on 03/28/2019 revoking ifp, appeal taken in bad faith. [11249749] (CW) [Entered: 04/02/2019 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [11240799] (CKP) [Entered: 03/25/2019 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 4 Streamlined request [3] by Appellant Ms. Carneice Kathrine Hall-Johnson to extend time to file the brief is approved. Streamline requests allow for 30 day extensions. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Carneice Kathrine Hall-Johnson opening brief due 06/19/2019. Appellees Micki Callahan and City and County of San Francisco answering brief due 07/19/2019. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [11238359] (DLM) [Entered: 03/21/2019 05:21 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Ms. Carneice Kathrine Hall-Johnson. New requested due date is 06/17/2019. [11237829] --[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [2] .] (TYL) [Entered: 03/21/2019 02:22 PM] |
| Filing 2 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [3]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Party Ms. Carneice Kathrine Hall-Johnson. Hearing in San Francisco on 03/21/2019 at 09:00 A.M. (Courtroom: N/A). Filer sharing argument time: No. Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am generally qualified for admission to practice before the bar of the Ninth Circuit and that I will immediately apply for admission. Date of service: 03/21/2019. [11237646] [19-15508] (Hall-Johnson, Carneice) [Entered: 03/21/2019 01:28 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Carneice Kathrine Hall-Johnson opening brief due 05/20/2019. Appellees Micki Callahan and City and County of San Francisco answering brief due 06/20/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11235811] (RT) [Entered: 03/20/2019 01:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
