Bank of New York Mellon v. 2167 Maple Heights Trust, et al
| SUN CITY ANTHEM COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. and RED ROCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC |
| 2167 MAPLE HEIGHTS TRUST and BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, as Trustee for the Certificateholders of CWALT, Inc., Alternative Loan Trust 2005-13CB, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-13CB, FKA Bank of New York |
| 19-15520 |
| March 21, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON V. 2167 MAPLE HEIGHTS TRUST |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator by email should circumstances develop that warrant further settlement discussions. [11297064] (VS) [Entered: 05/14/2019 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed order MEDIATION (SL): The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows: appellant shall file an opening brief on or before June 18, 2019; appellee shall file an answering brief on or before July 18, 2019; appellant may file an optional reply brief within twenty one (21) days from the service date of the answering brief. [11279348] (AF) [Entered: 04/26/2019 03:53 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - AssessmentConference, 05/14/2019, 2:00 p.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [11279329] (VS) [Entered: 04/26/2019 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. By 04/26/2019, counsel for all parties intending to file briefs in this matter are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator by email of their clients' views on whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be amenable to settlement presently or in the foreseeable future. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested... This communication should not be filed with the court... The existing briefing schedule remains in effect... [11261109] (VS) [Entered: 04/11/2019 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/02/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11249378] (AD) [Entered: 04/02/2019 06:44 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant 2167 Maple Heights Trust Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/01/2019. [11249355] [19-15520] (Ayon, Luis) [Entered: 04/02/2019 12:00 AM] |
| Filing 2 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal pursuant to Ninth Cir. R. 42-1. [11246659] (LW) [Entered: 03/29/2019 12:12 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/28/2019. Appellant 2167 Maple Heights Trust opening brief due 05/20/2019. Appellee Bank of New York Mellon answering brief due 06/18/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11237324] (JBS) [Entered: 03/21/2019 11:27 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Bank of New York Mellon v. 2167 Maple Heights Trust, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Undetermined: 2167 MAPLE HEIGHTS TRUST | |
| Represented By: | Luis A. Ayon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Undetermined: BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, as Trustee for the Certificateholders of CWALT, Inc., Alternative Loan Trust 2005-13CB, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-13CB, FKA Bank of New York | |
| Represented By: | Tenesa Susan Powell |
| Represented By: | Ariel Edward Stern Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SUN CITY ANTHEM COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: RED ROCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
