Thomas McCracken, et al v. Regional Transportation Commis, et al
Defendant / Appellee: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA, M. J. MAYNARD and CARL SCARBROUGH
Plaintiff / Appellant: THOMAS MCCRACKEN and CE MOBILE INSTALLS, LTD.
Case Number: 19-15527
Filed: March 22, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 15, 2019 Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - AssessmentConference, 06/06/2019, 2:00 p.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11297929] (VS) [Entered: 05/15/2019 09:36 AM]
April 11, 2019 Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. By 04/26/2019, counsel for all parties intending to file briefs in this matter are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator by email of their clients' views on whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be amenable to settlement presently or in the foreseeable future. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested... This communication should not be filed with the court... The existing briefing schedule remains in effect... [11261106] (VS) [Entered: 04/11/2019 02:34 PM]
April 1, 2019 Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/01/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11248396] (AD) [Entered: 04/01/2019 12:44 PM]
April 1, 2019 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellees Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada, M. J. Maynard and Carl Scarbrough Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/01/2019. [11247845] [19-15527] (Cassity, Robert) [Entered: 04/01/2019 09:34 AM]
March 29, 2019 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/29/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11247329] (AD) [Entered: 03/29/2019 06:44 PM]
March 29, 2019 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Thomas McCracken and CE Mobile Installs, Ltd. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/29/2019. [11246770] [19-15527] (Bach, Jason) [Entered: 03/29/2019 01:19 PM]
March 22, 2019 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/29/2019. Transcript ordered by 04/22/2019. Transcript due 05/20/2019. Appellants CE Mobile Installs, Ltd. and Thomas McCracken opening brief due 07/01/2019. Appellees M. J. Maynard, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada and Carl Scarbrough answering brief due 08/01/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11239086] (RT) [Entered: 03/22/2019 12:31 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Thomas McCracken, et al v. Regional Transportation Commis, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA
Represented By: Gregory S. Gilbert
Represented By: Robert J. Cassity Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: M. J. MAYNARD
Represented By: Gregory S. Gilbert
Represented By: Robert J. Cassity Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CARL SCARBROUGH
Represented By: Gregory S. Gilbert
Represented By: Robert J. Cassity Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: THOMAS MCCRACKEN
Represented By: Jason Bach Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CE MOBILE INSTALLS, LTD.
Represented By: Jason Bach Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?