Michael Fries v. Kernan, et al
| PFAIFFER, R. TINSLEY, KERNAN, C. GONZALES, A. LUCAS, J. MCALISTER, D. SELLERS, C. K. CHEN, R. LOZOVOY and FAULKNER |
| MICHAEL ACHILLES FRIES |
| 19-15624 |
| April 3, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed order (EDWARD LEAVY, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN and CARLOS T. BEA) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1330 (9th Cir. 1986) (denial of appointment of counsel in civil case is not appealable); Branson v. City of Los Angeles, 912 F.2d 334, 336 (9th Cir. 1990) (denial of reconsideration of non-appealable order is itself not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [11315678] (WL) [Entered: 05/31/2019 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Michael Achilles Fries motion to set aside and overrule order of 4/24/19 filed in the USDC. Deficiencies: None. [11313567] (RR) [Entered: 05/30/2019 12:03 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Michael Achilles Fries supplemental motion and/or for injunction relief. Deficiencies: None. [11280904] (RR) [Entered: 04/29/2019 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Michael Achilles Fries letter dated 04/11/209 re: I absolutely do need a copy of my 20-page, motion and appeal from judgment sent to this court on 3/25/19. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11268972] (RR) [Entered: 04/18/2019 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Michael Achilles Fries opening brief due 06/03/2019. [11251359] (JPD) [Entered: 04/03/2019 10:35 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
