Danelle Sinclair, et al v. Twitter, Inc., et al
| GOOGLE LLC, TWITTER, INC. and FACEBOOK, INC. |
| DANELLE SINCLAIR, as Guardian Ad Litem for A. Tucker and O. Tucker and ISABELLA TUCKER |
| 19-15625 |
| April 3, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellee Twitter, Inc. Joint Motion to stay appellate proceedings. Date of service: 05/14/2019. [11297246] [19-15625] (Carome, Patrick) [Entered: 05/14/2019 03:09 PM] |
| Filing 9 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is NOT SELECTED for inclusion in the Mediation Program. [11260728] (VS) [Entered: 04/11/2019 11:48 AM] |
| Filing 8 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is NOT SELECTED for inclusion in the Mediation Program. Counsel may contact circuit mediator to discuss services available through the court's mediation program, to request a settlement assessment conf, or to request a stay of the appeal for settlement purposes. Also, upon agreement of the parties, the brfing sch can be modified or vacated to facilitate settlement discussions. Csl are requested to send copies of this order to their clients. Info regarding the mediation program may be found at www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [11260720] (VS) [Entered: 04/11/2019 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 7 Added attorney Joseph Friedman Tartakovsky for Facebook, Inc.. [11260435] (RL) [Entered: 04/11/2019 09:53 AM] |
| Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/10/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11260181] (AD) [Entered: 04/11/2019 06:44 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellee Facebook, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/10/2019. [11260158] [19-15625] (Linsley, Kristin) [Entered: 04/10/2019 10:45 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Joseph Friedman Tartakovsky for Appellee Facebook, Inc.. Date of service: 04/10/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11260152] [19-15625] (Tartakovsky, Joseph) [Entered: 04/10/2019 09:49 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/09/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11257886] (AD) [Entered: 04/09/2019 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Danelle Sinclair and Isabella Tucker Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/09/2019. [11257211] [19-15625] (Altman, Keith) [Entered: 04/09/2019 08:26 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 04/10/2019. Appellants Danelle Sinclair and Isabella Tucker opening brief due 06/03/2019. Appellees Facebook, Inc., Google LLC and Twitter, Inc. answering brief due 07/02/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11251286] (JBS) [Entered: 04/03/2019 10:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
