Michael Urias v. D. King, et al
R. UHDE, J. KIEL, D. KING and R. HEISE |
MICHAEL URIAS |
19-15652 |
April 5, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Filed Appellant Michael Urias FORM 27 motion for reconsideration of dismissal. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/05/2019. [11293796] (RL) [Entered: 05/10/2019 03:12 PM] |
Filing 4 Received original and 3 copies of Appellant Michael Urias opening brief (Informal: Yes) 4 pages. Served on 04/28/2019. Major deficiencies: case closed. [11283871] (SML) [Entered: 05/01/2019 03:48 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed Appellant Michael Urias motion for appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: Case closed. Served on 04/24/2019. [11282005] (RL) [Entered: 04/30/2019 11:37 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed order (DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and PAUL J. WATFORD) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal, served on March 31, 2019 and filed on April 4, 2019, was not filed or delivered to prison officials within 30 days after the district courts judgment entered on February 6, 2019. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11275988] (OC) [Entered: 04/24/2019 03:13 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Michael Urias opening brief due 06/03/2019. [11254770] (JPD) [Entered: 04/05/2019 02:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.