Joseph McGhee v. High Mountain Health LLC, et al
| HIGH RIVER CONSULTING LLC, DAVID SPILLMAN, STEVEN THOMPSON, KATHERINE SPILLMAN, ASPEN MANAGEMENT LLC, HIGH MOUNTAIN HEALTH LLC, PROGROWTECH and DAVID STILLEY |
| JOSEPH MARTIN MCGHEE |
| 19-15697 |
| April 10, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED. (DFO, WAF and PJW) [11297748] (NAC) [Entered: 05/15/2019 07:34 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and PAUL J. WATFORD) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable); Religious Tech. Ctr. v. Scott, 869 F.2d 1306 (9th Cir. 1989) (denial of temporary restraining order is appealable only if the denial is tantamount to the denial of a preliminary injunction). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [11274154] (RT) [Entered: 04/23/2019 02:43 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Joseph Martin McGhee Motion for appointment of pro bono counsel. Date of service: 04/12/2019. [11262409] [19-15697] (McGhee, Joseph) [Entered: 04/12/2019 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Joseph Martin McGhee opening brief due 06/10/2019. [11258816] (JBS) [Entered: 04/10/2019 09:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
