Gregory Taylor v. Robert Neuschmid
| GREGORY TAYLOR |
| ROBERT NEUSCHMID, Warden |
| 19-15701 |
| April 10, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Gregory Taylor motion to reconsider Panel order of the Court filed on 05/23/2019. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/04/2019. [11323793] (CW) [Entered: 06/07/2019 03:01 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Gregory Taylor motion for transcripts. Deficiencies: case closed . Served on 05/17/2019. [11310149] (CW) [Entered: 05/28/2019 11:46 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed order (JAY S. BYBEE and CARLOS T. BEA) We have received and reviewed appellants response to this courts April 11, 2019, order to show cause. The request for a certificate of appealability is denied because the notice of appeal was not timely filed and appellant did not file a motion to extend time for appeal in the district court within the jurisdictional time limit. See 28 U.S.C. 2107, 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A). Any pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [11307507] (JPD) [Entered: 05/23/2019 01:13 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Gregory Taylor response to order to show cause. Served on 04/18/2019. [11273068] (CW) [Entered: 04/23/2019 08:39 AM] |
| Filing 3 RECEIVED (COPY) CERTIFIED RECORD ON APPEAL. Record Part: State Lodged Docs, No. of Volumes: 1, Sealed: n. [11260593] (SOS) [Entered: 04/11/2019 10:54 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KMB): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the request for certificate of appealability because the notice of appeal was not filed or deposited for mailing in the prisons internal mail system within 30 days after the district courts judgment entered on February 22, 2019. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), (c). Within 21 days after the filing date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of the request for certificate of appealability or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of appellants memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this request for certificate of appealability pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. [11260419] (AF) [Entered: 04/11/2019 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 02/22/2019. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11259032] (WL) [Entered: 04/10/2019 10:24 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Gregory Taylor v. Robert Neuschmid | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: GREGORY TAYLOR | |
| Represented By: | Gregory Taylor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: ROBERT NEUSCHMID, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Keith Paul Sager |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
