Melvin Simmons, Jr. v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
| ALEX PADILLA, SCOTT KERNAN, MICHAEL COHEN, XAVIER BECERRA, DAVE JONES, EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., DAVID BAUGHMAN, Warden, KATHLEEN ALLISON, Warden, WILL LIGHTBOURNE, Director and JOHN CHIANG |
| MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS, Jr. |
| 19-15717 |
| April 10, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [11305017] (RR) [Entered: 05/21/2019 04:56 PM] |
| Filing 3 Mail returned on 05/20/2019 addressed to Melvin Joseph Simmons, Jr., re: 04/10/2019 case opening letter [ # 1 ] resent on 04/29/2019. Returned envelope notes: refused, return to sender, unable to forward. Resending to: case files; inmate has refused mail. [11303646] (LA) [Entered: 05/20/2019 06:24 PM] |
| Filing 2 Mail returned on 04/29/2019 addressed to Melvin Joseph Simmons, Jr., re: 04/10/2019 Case Opening Information [ # 1 ]. Returned envelope notes: Return to sender, refused by inmate, unable to forawrd. Resending to: HDSP - HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON (SUSANVILLE) P.O. Box 3030 Susanville, CA 96127-3030. [11280807] (JBS) [Entered: 04/29/2019 02:48 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT. NO APPEARANCE BY APPELLEES. This appeal is subject to a pre-filing review order in case number 11-80144. The appeal will be reviewed by the Court to determine whether it will be allowed to proceed. No briefing schedule will be set until/unless the Court determines that the appeal should be allowed to proceed. [11259828] (HH) [Entered: 04/10/2019 03:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
