Mickey Clayton v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., et al
AMERICA'S SERVICING COMPANY, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as: White Corporations I-X and FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Nebraska corporation |
HSBC BANK USA, N.A., trustee of Nomura Asset-Backed Certificate Series, 2006-AF1 and WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE CORPORATION |
MICKEY NELSON CLAYTON, husband |
19-15766 |
April 16, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Added attorneys Amanda Weaver and Andrew Martin Jacobs for HSBC Bank USA, N.A. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Corporation. [11322202] (RL) [Entered: 06/06/2019 01:27 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Amanda Z. Weaver for Appellees HSBC Bank USA, N.A. and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Corporation. Date of service: 06/06/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11322117] [19-15766] (Weaver, Amanda) [Entered: 06/06/2019 12:50 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Andrew M. Jacobs for Appellees HSBC Bank USA, N.A. and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Corporation. Date of service: 06/06/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11322106] [19-15766] (Jacobs, Andrew) [Entered: 06/06/2019 12:44 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Mickey Nelson Clayton opening brief due 06/14/2019. Appellees HSBC Bank USA, N.A. and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Corporation answering brief due 07/15/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11266169] (JBS) [Entered: 04/16/2019 03:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.