Raul Garza v. NFL, et al
| RAUL GARZA |
| NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, Players and Staff and LEBRON JAMES |
| 19-15779 |
| April 17, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Raul Garza response to Court order dated 05/30/2019. Served on 06/07/2019. [11330604] (QDL) [Entered: 06/13/2019 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed order (EDWARD LEAVY, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN and CARLOS T. BEA) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal, served on April 11, 2019 and filed on April 17, 2019, was not filed or delivered to prison officials within 30 days after the district courts judgment entered on July 13, 2018. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11313969] (JMR) [Entered: 05/30/2019 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received original and 1 copies of Appellant Raul Garza opening brief (Informal: Yes) 6 pages. Served on 05/23/2019. Major deficiencies: motion pending. [11313943] (KWG) [Entered: 05/30/2019 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Raul Garza motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [11312164] (NAC) [Entered: 05/29/2019 01:54 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Raul Garza opening brief due 06/17/2019. [11267270] (RT) [Entered: 04/17/2019 01:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
