State of Arizona v. Robert Carter
| STATE OF ARIZONA |
| ROBERT ANTHONY CARTER |
| 19-15806 |
| April 19, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant Robert Anthony Carter motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/27/2019. [11327070] (CW) [Entered: 06/11/2019 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Robert Anthony Carter letter dated 06/03/2019 re: request for copy of rules and docket.. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11326006] (CW) [Entered: 06/11/2019 07:53 AM] |
| Filing 6 ENTRY UPDATED. Streamlined request by Appellant Robert Anthony Carter to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. Briefing shall be reset as necessary upon the Courts disposition of the court's order and the motion to proceed in IFP. Dockets [4,5] [ See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [11325497]--[Edited 06/10/2019 by DLM]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached PDF. 06/10/2019 by SLM] (DLM) [Entered: 06/10/2019 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Robert Anthony Carter motion to extend time to comply with the order dated 04/30/2019. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/20/2019. [11310180] (CW) [Entered: 05/28/2019 11:53 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous because appellants notice of removal fails to allege a basis for federal court jurisdiction over his state criminal prosecution under 28 U.S.C. 1443. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellee may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal remains stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss this appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [11306509] (AF) [Entered: 05/22/2019 04:55 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Robert Anthony Carter financial affidavit in support or request for attorney, expert, or other court services without payment of fee (CJA Form 23). Date of service: 05/01/2019. [11282820] [19-15806] (Carter, Robert) [Entered: 05/01/2019 06:48 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11281690] (CKP) [Entered: 04/30/2019 10:22 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Robert Anthony Carter opening brief due 06/17/2019. Appellee State of Arizona answering brief due 07/16/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11269769] (HC) [Entered: 04/19/2019 09:25 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: State of Arizona v. Robert Carter | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: STATE OF ARIZONA | |
| Represented By: | Tristan J. Bigler Esquire |
| Represented By: | Tristan James Bigler Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: ROBERT ANTHONY CARTER | |
| Represented By: | Robert Anthony Carter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
