Fernando Hernandez v. Aaron Ford, et al
| FERNANDO NAVARRO HERNANDEZ |
| WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden and AARON DARNELL FORD |
| 19-15946 |
| May 2, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Petitioners motion (DE #[ # 5 ]) to extend time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is now due August 1, 2019. The answering brief is due August 29, 2019. Petitioners optional reply brief, if any, is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11340154] (WL) [Entered: 06/21/2019 09:26 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Fernando Navarro Hernandez motion to extend time. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/16/2019. [11339736] (JFF) [Entered: 06/20/2019 03:56 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Fernando Navarro Hernandez letter dated 05/15/2019 re: Case information and request copies. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11304293] (JFF) [Entered: 05/21/2019 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Fernando Navarro Hernandez motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/13/2019. [11302790] (JFF) [Entered: 05/20/2019 12:01 PM] |
| Filing 2 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 19-15946: IFP] ). [11285377] (HH) [Entered: 05/02/2019 04:56 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Fernando Navarro Hernandez opening brief due 07/01/2019. Appellees Aaron Darnell Ford and William Gittere answering brief due 07/29/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11285373] (HH) [Entered: 05/02/2019 04:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
