Stanley Gleason v. Constantino, et al
| CONSTANTINO, Lieutenant, J. PEREZ and P. GARCIA, Sergeant; Administrators in their Individual & Official Capacities |
| STANLEY GLEASON |
| 19-15956 |
| May 3, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MANDATE ISSUED. (EL, CMC and CTB) [11343258] (RL) [Entered: 06/25/2019 09:07 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed order (EDWARD LEAVY, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN and CARLOS T. BEA) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable); Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328 (9th Cir. 1986) (denial of appointment of counsel in civil case is not appealable); see also Religious Tech. Ctr. v. Scott, 869 F.2d 1306 (9th Cir. 1989) (denial of temporary restraining order is appealable only if the denial is tantamount to the denial of a preliminary injunction). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [11317162] (OC) [Entered: 06/03/2019 11:58 AM] |
| Filing 3 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant Stanley Gleason opening brief (Informal: Yes) 6 pages. Served on 05/01/2019. Major deficiencies: motion to appoint counsel pending. [11290534] (SML) [Entered: 05/08/2019 11:04 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Stanley Gleason motion for appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/01/2019. [11289806] (RL) [Entered: 05/07/2019 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: to be set. Preliminary Injunction Appeal. C.R. 3-3. [11286620] (RT) [Entered: 05/03/2019 04:19 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
